AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 2902 - Too fast, too soon?

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 3, 2013

2902 - Too fast, too soon?

Too fast, too soon?

April 1 deadline given by the PMO to expand direct benefits transfer scheme to 18 states looks a tough task

Devjyot Ghoshal / New Delhi Jan 01, 2013, 00:44 IST

In the first few months of 2012, the Nandan Nilekani-led Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) looked like it had run out of steam. Its mandate to provide Aadhaar, a 12-digit unique identification number, to 200 million people was complete and the organisation remained seemingly stalled, waiting for a green light from the government.

In the interim, the UIDAI’s skirmishes with the National Population Registry (NPR) under the home ministry, then headed by P Chidambaram, were growing worse, and eventually needed the intervention of the Prime Minister’s Office (PMO) to settle things.

About nine months later, it was Chidambaram, now finance minister, who today finally laid out the contours of the direct cash transfer programme, now known as Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT), to be rolled out in 20 districts for seven schemes across the country starting tommorow. The transition from idling to frenetic activity for the UIDAI and Aadhaar has been quick.

It is a hugely curtailed launch, however, given that the initial shortlist consisted of 51 districts (later 43) and 34 schemes. Yet, even scaled-down, the government might be rushing through with this too fast, too soon.(DELIVERING CASH TO THE COMMON MAN)

Senior officials of the UIDAI attest there may be a lack of preparation on the ground as the scheme takes off. That might be why the number of districts where the scheme will debut have been reduced.

A senior official from the PMO said Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had told those involved in implementation of DBT that the initial phase of the launch should be completed with minimum glitches.

Despite that, the penetration of Aadhaar (the desired level is about 80 per cent) is lacking in many of the short-listed districts. Officials explained that the seeding of Aadhaar into government databases is also likely to be significantly difficult. That is because a number of these databases are not digitised, apart from being differently organised. As a result, manual-matching of beneficiary details and Aadhaar will have to be carried out, officials said.

At the same time, much of rural India remains unbanked, although the finance ministry is pushing for greater coverage using ATMs, banking correspondents and common service centres. More, the country’s post offices, where a large number of rural workers have accounts, are still out of the purview of the Aadhaar Payments Bridge, the gateway that will drive transactions. Connectivity, too, is an issue, for both mobile telephony and broadband access, government officials claim.

Everything taken together, the April 1 date given by the PMO to expand the direct cash transfer scheme to 18 states looks tough. Maybe that is why the statement put out by the government after Chidambaram’s announcement says the scheme’s expansion beyond 43 districts will only happen “after a careful assessment of readiness.”