In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, February 3, 2013

2908 - Implementing the cash transfer scheme is proving a challenge



Implementing the cash transfer scheme is proving a challenge
Shweta Punj     January 2, 2013

In the labyrinthine lanes of Chawri Bazar in Old Delhi stands a Gender Resource Centre (GRC) of the Delhi government's 'Mission Convergence'. Along with over 100 other such centres, it is tasked with executing the ambitious "Cash for Food" programme, Annashree Yojana, launched on December 15 in the presence of UPA Chairperson and Congress President Sonia Gandhi.

The centre is a twelve-feet square room on the first floor of a dilapidated building, furnished with four tables, a dozen-odd chairs, an old, ripped sofa and five computers. There are about six women, mostly in burqa, waiting for their paperwork to be completed - which mainly comprises filling up a form seeking basic details such as age, names of family members, etc. The forms are being filled on their behalf by a GRC worker.

It is a-first-of-its-kind project. The Union government eventually plans to implement direct cash transfer schemes in lieu of subsidies across the country. The Annashree scheme entitles the seniormost woman of a beneficiary household to Rs 600 every month, provided she does not claim food entitlement from a public distribution system (PDS) outlet.

The process of cash transfers has three attributes for the beneficiary: an identity in the form of an Aadhaar number, a bank account, and cash. The money will be transferred, electronically and automatically, to the bank account, and the beneficiary should be able to withdraw it from a micro-ATM at any of the GRC centres using her Unique Identification Number (UID) - linked biometric authentication.

Namia Begum has been waiting for money to be credited to her bank account for nearly two months
The scheme may well be a good idea, but a Business Todayinvestigation reveals that the government has missed out on fine-tuning the details, crucial to making the scheme work, before starting it. 

Micro-ATMs, for instance, are yet to be installed, and there is still ambiguity about the criteria for selecting beneficaries. The awareness campaigns of the government lack focus and the registration forms are in English, which immediately alienates a majority of the intended beneficiaries. It makes the process prone to errors and manipulation.

Two of the six women at the GRC centre in Chawri bazaar had been waiting for money to be credited to their bank accounts for nearly two months. Namia Begum, 63, enrolled in the Annashree Yojana in October - enrollment had begun before the formal launch - but since she does not have an account in one of six banks that have been specified, she has received nothing, while technically the money has been transferred to her bank account. She says that when she enrolled, she was never told that having an account in one of the six specified banks was a precondition.

Six days after the scheme began, a data correction option was introduced in the enrollment form. "We will be able to start the process of opening her bank account today. We just got the data correction option," says Girish Chandra, Project Coordinator at the Chawri Bazar GRC.

While desktops have been placed for the beneficiaries to supposedly verify the data being entered, the form being in English makes it impossible for most to do so. 

How long will it take for the micro-ATMs of the specified banks to be installed? 

"We checked with Bank of India (one of the six partner banks). They said their system is not updated," says Chandra.

There was also widespread cynicism about the scheme actually working. Most of the intended beneficiaries were apprehensive that the project would not be well planned and executed and were reluctant to register, preferring to stick to their ration cards. The fear could also be partly due to a campaign against the project by the Bharatiya Janata Party during the Delhi municipal elections in early 2012. 

"There was some ambivalence around the project, because the opposition party ran a campaign stating that those who take cash transfers would be thrown out of the BPL (Below Poverty Line) list," says Santosh Vaidya, Director, Mission Convergence, and Special Secretary to Delhi Chief Minister Sheila Dikshit. Those in the BPL list get government assistance through various schemes, not just the PDS.

In Delhi under the Annashree Yojana, 300,000 families will get cash subsidies , according to state government estimates. For several of the women, a lump sum amount of Rs 4,800 - the Delhi government is crediting money with retrospective effect from April onwards - is a substantial amount, giving them hope of making a new beginning. 

Shakila, for instance, has nine children, and hopes to get one daughter married with the money. Babita, 29, has difficult choices - she wants to secure a future for her two-year-old daughter and also create some kind of regular income stream for her husband who has been out of work for months.

But for the moment the cash transfer scheme - while a promising alternative on paper to the existing inefficient, corruptionridden PDS - needs a lot more spadework to deliver the goods.