Why this Blog ? News articles in the Wide World of Web, quite often disappear with time, when they are relocated as archives with a different url. Archives in this blog serve as a library for those who are interested in doing Research on Aadhaar Related Topics. Articles are published with details of original publication date and the url.
Aadhaar
The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018
When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi
In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi
“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi
“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.
Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.
Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.
Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha
“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh
But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP
“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.
August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution
"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"
“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden
In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.
Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.
Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.
UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy
1) Denial
2) Issue fiats and point finger
3) Shoot messenger
4) Bury head in sand.
God Save India
Saturday, June 29, 2013
3466 - Aadhaar not mandatory to benefit from EPFO schemes - First Post
3465 - Direct benefit transfers hit as govt instructions reach offices late VINSON KURIAN - Hindu Business Line
3464 - Finally, LPG subsidy project rolls out in Mysore on July 1
3463 - Ranchi fares well in anti-poverty scheme - TOI
3462 - 50% of state to get Aadhaar cards by year-end - TOI
3461 - Govt looks to post offices to save direct benefits transfer scheme - TOI
Friday, June 28, 2013
3460 - The missing Act - Front Line
3459 - Can't act against websites for sharing information on Indians with US: SC - IBN Live
3458 - Aadhaar card: Compulsion by stealth - Economic Times
So I asked him about EPFO. Aadhaar has been made mandatory for EPFO, hasn't it? And EPFO can't be blamed on State governments. I was thereupon told that this is only for those who enrol in EPFO after March 2013 (I am not sure this is quite right) and therefore, Aadhaar isn't universally mandatory.
3457 - Between KYC, Aadhaar and CMS, India will be a police state - FirstPost
3456 - Aadhaar vs direct benefit transfer - Financial Express
Thursday, June 27, 2013
3455 - Cypherpunks, Edward Snowden, and the politics of mass surveillance - Live Mint
3454 - Direct benefit transfer for LPG crosses 1 million transactions - NDTV
Business Standard
With the direct benefit transfer (DBT) for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) almost completing a month, the scheme has so far roped in more than one million consumers getting direct cash transfers to their bank accounts in 18 districts across the country ...
|
CIOL
"About 67 lakh consumers from 18 districts are getting subsidy on LPG cylinders in their Aadhaar linked bank accounts," said a release and further added, The Direct Benefit Transfers for LPG (liquified petroleum gas) scheme would benefit over 6.7 ...
|
3453 - Schools in Mumbai fail to meet deadline for Aadhaar cards - Hindustan Times
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
3451 - Edward Snowden’s Ordeal Is Just Beginning By Julian Assange, WikiLeaks
23 June 13
3450 - Direct Cash Transfer - A Game Changer for Whom? 0 News Click
3449 - Easy to abuse cash assistance in NYS
Published : Friday, 21 Jun 2013, 6:21 PM EDT
- Al Vaughters
- Posted by: Eli George
Monday, June 24, 2013
3448 - RFID CHIP & NATIONAL ID Coming - You Tube
3447 - Aadhaar number must for teaching, non-teaching staff - Business Standard
"UID number is mandatory for teaching and non-teaching employees to draw their monthly salaries," Chief Minister Prithviraj Chavan was quoted as saying in a press statement issued here.
Chavan held a review meeting on Aadhaar card registration at his residence, which was attended by UIDAI Chairman Nandan Nilekani, chief secretary of Maharashtra J K Banthia and other senior officials of the state government.
"Speedy registration procedures are on to avail the Aadhaar card. UID number is mandatory for the government employees, college students availing scholarships," Chavan said.
Nilekani expressed satisfaction over UID registration process in the state and said a report in this regard will be submitted to the central government, it said.
Economic Times
"Speedy registration procedures are on to avail the Aadhaar card. UID number is mandatory for the government employees, college students availing ...
|
Jagran Josh
The Chief Minister of the Maharashtra Prithviraj Chavan quoted “UID number ... review meet held on Aadhaar Card Registration between the Chief Minister with ...
|
Press Trust of India
... the state to possess an Aadhaar card to draw their salaries from August. "UID number is mandatory for teaching and non-teaching employees to draw their ...
|
3446 - The spook department - Asianage
Yet the outrage continued. the New York Times has now highlighted the ties between the Silicon Valley and the “spy agency” NSA, underlining the “deep connections” between the two. The fact that Max Kelly, the chief security officer for Facebook responsible for protecting the data of its billion-plus users had left FB in 2010 to join the NSA was suddenly headline news today as proof of the nexus between Silicon Valley and the government’s spook department. American civil society — in spite of its tendency to accommodate security measures that “fight terror” — was very concerned.
The NSA’s interest in the Silicon Valley was understandable. Where information is power data is kingmaker. The amount of private data Silicon Valley has is amazing, and in an age of data mining it is heaven for commercial companies forever seeking information on consumers in order to ensnare them better. And when “security” is a magic word that quietly opens doors to a surveillance society, it is equally natural for the NSA to cosy up to the treasure trove in the Valley. Besides, on top of the raw data, the Silicon Valley also has sophisticated software that can analyse it. No wonder the NSA is so interested in a long and meaningful relationship. And no wonder the public — especially the media — is outraged.
We have seen this quiet convergence between government and commercial interests closer home. In India, with the Unique Identity (UID) number or Aadhaar project the boundary between government operations and private enterprise has blurred dangerously in the area of data collection. And there has been no outrage from the media, no flurry of concern from civil society, no panic — in spite of repeated warnings from worried experts and activists.
The Indian government uses its authority to collect personal data from its citizens and hands it all over to the Unique Identity Authority of India (UIDAI). For example, I went to get myself registered with the National Population Register (NPR), which is compulsory for all citizens. I specified, with the strict and repetitive enthusiasm of retired school teachers, that I did not want an Aadhaar number. Just the NPR, thank you. No UID, okay? Okay, okay, they said. Just look through here and give me your finger… And voila! I instantly got an Aadhaar number! The NPR data is automatically shared with the UID. And then, the data, by some peculiar logic, becomes the property of the UIDAI. The UIDAI can thereafter sell that data or share it with anyone they choose.
This may lead you to believe that the UIDAI is a rather peculiar government entity. Not so. Contrary to popular belief, the UIDAI is not a government entity at all. There was no democratic process behind it. There is no new law for it. In fact, when a couple of years after arbitrarily starting the UID process the government finally got around to drafting a Bill to convert the UIDAI into a statutory authority, it was unambiguously rejected by the Parliamentary Standing Committee on Finance, which examined it. Never mind. The UID project is elbowing its way through our fast eroding democracy without Parliament’s approval. And costing the national exchequer a bomb. After which, the UIDAI will not have any of the accountability issues that a government agency born and nurtured on tax payers’ money has. It will be a business enterprise bowing to – or winking at – only company laws.
Once the UIDAI has all its demographic and biometric data and processes in order it would swiftly cut the governmental umbilical cord and spring forth as a commercial body. Working for profit, it would offer identity authentication as a paid service to both private and government agencies. It will make money every time someone wants a gas or a telephone connection, a bank account, a PAN card, a passport, a credit card or whatever. The government will then have to buy its services.
Similarly, there are other data collating entities linked to the UID like the National Information Utilities (NIUs) that would be set up, fed, funded and nurtured by the government till they become self-sustaining, at which point the government would become their paying customer. NIUs will privatise government databases and, like the UID, will thereafter own that government data and use it for profit.
So what’s wrong with this fond sharing of personal data between the government and the born-to-be-commercial entities it creates? Just that unlike commercial companies, the government is supposed to protect the information on its citizens and not use it for its own benefit. There is a certain trust involved. Giving out the information to commercial companies is a breach of trust. It violates the citizen’s right to privacy. And it can lead to enormous harm.
With the wall between government and private sector collapsing imperceptibly, our problems are compounded. Especially since India does not have specific laws to protect either data or our privacy. Data mining is the new power tool, and both government and private businesses are likely to use data like never before. Now government accountability is low, and we cannot be sure that all this detailed information — say on caste or religious identities — would not be used for political purposes to harm certain communities and thereby harm our democracy. And once the government hands over the data to private enterprise there is no state accountability, and information on Indian citizens may be used by any paying customer for their own purposes.
Besides, government has no qualms about surveillance. Like the US we too need to “fight terror” and would happily overrule citizen’s rights for it. Unlike the US, our civil society seems unperturbed by the possibility. Or by the irresponsible sharing of personal data by government and the private sector that can wipe out the democratic freedoms guaranteed by our Constitution.
Sunday, June 23, 2013
3445 - Edward Snowden's Wake Up Call: Cyber Security, Surveillance And Democracy By S.G.Vombatkere - Counter Currents
Countercurrents.org