In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, November 11, 2013

4906 - People-watching at an Aadhaar camp - Hindu Business Line

October 29, 2013

Sravanthi.C

Recently, we found out that an Aadhaar camp was on at a school in our vicinity. This was Phase II. Over three years ago, some surveyors had visited us and given us a receipt to be presented at the centre carrying out this work. Despite all the conflicting information about it, the Supreme Court hearings and the concerns about privacy, we went - we had not researched it enough and the talk of its link to facilities such as gas connections was frightening enough to make us line up for one.

A few years ago, our gas connection was cancelled because we did not order a refill within six months. We had not used up the cylinder. (We didn’t know about the six-month rule, and who knew fuel conservation was not appreciated?) During that time, a ration card was mandatory to get a gas connection. Our gas agency refused to accept our passports or voter ID cards as proof of identity. (On the latter, our names and addresses were mangled, anyway.) We did not have the ration card and had to use influence merely to get information about the process and apply. It was bedlam. An enraged old man, cloth bag in hand, was descending the stairs and roaring that he would hack everyone into pieces for putting him through the wringer. Soon after, the Government announced that ration cards were not mandatory for this purpose.

I have to say the Aadhaar enrolment was smoother, given that it took only two hours of waiting despite only one person working there. The person at the other desk had left for lunch and not returned. His colleague said he was new and she did not have his phone number. There were about six people in the queue ahead of us. The penny dropped fairly soon that each person represented at least three others in his/her family. Soon, the line grew longer. The absent official showed no signs of coming back and his hapless colleague was doing a sterling job of ignoring questions and complaints and getting on with her work.

Families came in and surveyed the scene. Some shook their heads and left. By now, the crowd had swelled. Angry chatter filled the room as people who had been coming there for days wanted to be heard – one had not got the print-out issued at the end of the process, another’s name had been spelt wrong, another had a clarification to seek … the lady officiating there ruthlessly ignored everyone and single-mindedly continued photographing and fingerprinting those in the queue. She probably could not have functioned otherwise, a thick skin was vital to get on with the job. But it was impossible to overlook one’s own needs and feelings. Why is this scene repeated every single time we have to go about something which involves a government department? Rarely can we get what we want without being turned away rudely, told our documentation is inadequate or wrong, waiting endlessly and in vain, and feeling toxic with fury and helplessness.

Meanwhile, a fight broke out between someone who tried to jump the queue and the rest of the crowd. Then the computer packed up for a while. A lady who said she had retired as an executive/officer at the Secretariat kept saying scornfully that she was “the one who had issued the orders for all these people to be employed in the Aadhaar project”. On and off, she implored the young men in the crowd to go and take up the Aadhaar work on the absconding official’s computer. A man who had started yelling 10 minutes earlier continued to do so without any let-up. Amidst the tumult, some people being enrolled got confused and failed to identify mistakes even when they were asked to check.

We were glad to get out of this tower, well, room, of babel. And now begins the wait to receive yet another proof of identity. Next, I have to steel myself for passport renewal. But that’s two years away and hopefully, things will improve.

Keywords: AadhaarLPG subsidygovernment ID cardproof of identitygovernment schemesUIDAadhaar camps