In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, November 14, 2013

4914 - Deadline close but few takers for Aadhaar-account linking - Indian Express


Express News Service : kolkata, Sun Nov 03 2013, 03:03 hrs


Since yesterday's rolling out of scheme of transferring LPG subsidy directly into a customer's bank account, only a few have shown interest — about five to ten per cent — in getting their Aadhaar number linked to their bank accounts.

This lack of interest among consumers has left the gas distributors worried who already face the challenge of not many customers having the Aadhaar card in the first place.

"Then there are many who have an Aadhaar card but no bank account," said Sushanta Mukherjee, president, West Bengal LPG Distributors' Forum, who informed that the Aadhaar enrollment progress in the state is "not very encouraging".

Giving details, general secretary of Indane Distributors' Association, Bijan Behari Biswas said: "About five per cent of our consumers in Kolkata have submitted the relevant forms on the first day (November 1, the day the scheme was rolled out) to get the Aadhar number linked with the bank account. In Howrah and the Coochbehar, the percentage is slightly higher ( 7 and 15 per cent, respectively) because of the early start of the process there."

He also said that there are many who have submitted their forms to the association but not to the bank, adding that gas distributors should follow the company directive irrespective of whether Aadhaar card are linked or not and continue with the enrollment till the ministry decides otherwise.

The petroleum ministry, in a recent notification, allowed consumers a three-month period to get their Aadhaar number linked with the bank accounts and submit the details to the LPG distributors to not only avail the subsidy but get the amount directly credited to their bank account. Most distributors, however. feel that the deadline should be extended.

While Mukherjee ruled out the possibility of the state managing to "cover 100 per cent Aadhaar enrollment", saying "there is no guarantee it could be done in three months' time", Biswas said to meet the January 31 target of getting the consumers' Aadhaar number linked to their bank account "would be a tall order given the low percentage of citizens who own the card in the first place".

"Only about 25 per cent of eligible citizens have received the card after so many years of its implementation. It is highly unlikely that all of them would get it by January 31, 2014, the deadline set by the petroleum ministry," he said.

The number of consumers queuing up at the distributor's office and the bank to avail the benefits of the scheme dipped after the SC verdict, which ruled against making the Aadhar card a mandatory requirement.

"We now wait for the next SC hearing on November 6 when the final verdict will be out. People may start flocking to the distributors after that," said Sanjay Agarwal, zonal secretary of All India HP Gas Dealers' Association.

Defending the scheme despite the visible signs of it not producing the desired result, Nimai Chowdhury, a south Kolkata resident who is a school teacher, still believes the "scheme has not completely failed".

"It is an effective way of ensuring that the subsidised cylinders reach the right person and black marketing of cylinders are kept in check to a large extent. Even if the Supreme Court dismisses the Aadhar linking, the ministry will look for an alternative to return the subsidy amount to consumers," Chowdhury said.