In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, June 7, 2014

5570 - The privacy nightmare that no one in India talks about - Medianama



By Nikhil Pahwa on Jun 4th, 2014  

Last week, I walked into an office building in DLF Cyber City in Gurgaon, the one that has offices for Google and Yahoo, only to find that the security guards at the entrance wanted me to hold up my identity card (I carry my drivers license) in front of a digital scanner, “for security purposes”. I declined, and asked them to explain why. “For security,” I was told, once again. On being asked about what they do with the data, and where it is stored, the guards at the entrance were apologetic, and eventually delegated upwards: they took me to a small one-room office in the basement parking of the building, which looked and felt like a dilapidated government office, and appeared to house the officers in charge of security at DLF Cyber City.



I was taken to the back of the room, where a grey haired man sitting behind a desk told me that I can go in, as long as the executives of the company I was visiting called up to validate my identity. When I continued to inquire about their privacy policy, and how I know that my data is secure, another man stepped up behind me and rudely inquired about how it is any of my business. This policy of scanning identifying documents is new, and the system was put into place only a month and a half ago.

I faced a similar situation while visiting Amazon at the World Trade Center in Bangalore last month. While the building security declined to let me through, the executives I had gone to meet were quite apologetic about the situation, and met me in the building lobby. They had similar misgivings about this data being collected, and understood my point of view of not giving my data.

*

We give our data away online every day – to apps, search engines, social networks, email newsletters and media companies, e-commerce firms, and even if some of them don’t follow guidelines, or keep changing their privacy policies, at least they have one. The Right to be Forgotten is a tricky new idea, but in India, we don’t even have a privacy law. While we give our data away to mobile phone companies and banks, and hope they don’t sell it, the other seemingly innocuous data collection takes place at entrances to office buildings and gated colonies: large notebooks with yellowed pages, and frayed and filthy edges collect names, addresses, mobile numbers and signatures. I have friends who put in fake or incomplete mobile numbers, but what no one asks is – what happens to these registers after they’re filled up? What is their privacy policy? We don’t worry about these things because we’re used to it.

There is data that I put on a business card – name, address, mobile number, twitter handle and mobile number – that I have no issues sharing. Some of it is on MediaNama’s twitter profile. What is important here is that it is my choice, but it is also worrying that we’re in a situation where someone has to make these decisions. I chose not to allow The World Trade Center in Bangalore to scan my ID, and they chose not to let me in. It’s almost like a trade. But there is data that validates my identity, such as my drivers license number, that I don’t want anyone to get access to. I’m willing to show it, if anyone wants to validate it for authenticity, but I certainly don’t want them to copy it. How do I know someone wont be able to copy this digital scan, and create a fake copy of my ID?

There is also some sense of privacy and security in the fact that many of the databases that collect information about us are not connected. This is the danger that the Aadhaar number holds: being used as a primary identifier, it becomes a number that connects multiple databases together. Of course, this is a country wherein the election commission has allowed demographic data to be copied en masse (read this and this).


There are many reasons why the government of India needs to implement a privacy law. The earlier government had drafted a Bill on the Right to Privacy in the hope of curbing the trend of unbridled surveillance and to ensure that there are legal mechanisms for safeguarding individual privacy, to balance the concerns of both individual privacy and state security. Read more about it here.