In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, June 27, 2014

5611 - On table: Aadhaar for citizens, not residents - The Telegraph India




NISHIT DHOLABHAI


New Delhi, June 18: Aadhaar numbers and cards will be issued only
to Indian citizens and not “usual residents”, the government today
proposed in a departure from the UPA’s policy. 

The proposal was made at a meeting chaired by Union home minister Rajnath Singh and attended by the registrar-general of citizenship registration, C. Chandramouli.

The new policy will necessitate changes to a cabinet decision taken by the UPA, besides clearing confusion over the fate of the Aadhaar cards that are issued to residents and are not proof of citizenship.

Sources said it might take over a month for the proposal to be fleshed out and placed before the cabinet.

Over 60 crore Aadhaar numbers have been issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) to “usual residents” — those who have stayed in a locality for at least six months and intend to do so for another six months.

The unique numbers will remain in place. However, if the cabinet clears the proposal, the numbered residents will be issued citizen cards only on the basis of additional death and birth registration data.

Today’s decision would limit the UIDAI’s role to generating the unique numbers and conducting a de-duplication exercise to weed out individuals getting more than one number. The UIDAI eventually may not hold camps to issue Aadhaar cards if Singh’s decision is ratified by the cabinet.

The UPA government’s plan was to derive the subset of citizens from the National Population Register (NPR) after verification of citizenship. However, the NDA government feels that there should be a single exercise leading to a national register of Indian citizens.

Singh said effective steps should be taken to create the national register of citizens, an official release said.

He instructed officials that all proposals, including update of the database through linkages with the birth and death registration system and the issuance of national identity cards to citizens, be brought for approval at the earliest, sources said.

Over the next month, the Registrar-General of India is expected to prepare a roadmap to issue citizenship cards. “The Centre feels unique numbers and cards should be issued only to citizens and there is no need for two types of cards,” a source said.

Since 2010, numbers and cards were issued after collection of biometric data (iris scan and fingerprinting) by two authorities: the RGI’s office under the National Population Register scheme and the Nandan Nilekani-led UIDAI. Nilekani, who was the face of the UPA’s Aadhaar programme, resigned as UIDAI chairman on March 13 before contesting on a Congress ticket from Bangalore. He lost the election.

The Aadhaar numbers were aimed at improving the use and implementation of benefits and services provided under government schemes, planning and security.

There was some confusion when the UPA decided to allow two agencies to collect data of residents. The UIDAI collected biometric data and issued Aadhaar cards while the NPR also gathered the data. P. Chidambaram and Nilekani had run-ins over which agency would enrol residents.

Plans of the previous government to legislate the UIDAI virtually stand scrapped after today’s meeting.

Getting an Aadhaar card from the UIDAI was optional but enrolment under the National Population Register scheme is mandatory under Citizenship Rules. Often, residents were confused whether they needed to go to an “NPR camp” if they had been to an “Aadhaar camp”. They will have to, according to rules.

The resident is required to visit a National Population Register camp with the unique Aadhaar number, provide additional personal information and undergo verification for registration in the population.

“The enrolment will now be done completely under the National Register of Indian Citizens by the RGI’s office,” said a source.