In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, September 21, 2014

5797 - NDA to revive direct benefit transfer on LPG subsidy - Live Mint


The rethink has come about in the backdrop of the launch of the financial inclusion programme that seeks to create a bank account for every household Remya Nair 

There are around 140 million cooking gas customers in the country. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint



The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government proposes to revive the direct benefit transfer scheme under which the subsidies on cooking gas and kerosene will be transferred to the bank account of beneficiaries, a top government official said. The rethink has come about in the backdrop of the launch of the financial inclusion programme that seeks to create a bank account for every household. “First, we are looking at transferring kerosene and LPG (liquefied petroleum gas) subsidies directly to beneficiaries through bank accounts. There are many states that are already making payments directly into the bank accounts of beneficiaries under various government programmes,” financial services secretary G.S. Sandhu said while addressing a seminar organized by Skoch group. “It will be a calibrated approach.” There are around 140 million cooking gas customers in the country. Transfer of subsidies directly into bank accounts of beneficiaries is expected to prevent leakages and ensure that the beneficiaries get the money they are entitled to. The Congress-led United Progressive Alliance (UPA) had launched the direct benefits transfer programme last year for transferring benefits under various welfare schemes to beneficiary accounts, but with many beneficiaries not having bank accounts, its progress was limited. It was forced to put on hold its scheme to directly transfer cooking gas subsidies after complaints arose of inadequate linkage of Aadhaar unique identity numbers with bank accounts. Last year, the Supreme Court also ruled that the government could not make Aadhaar numbers mandatory for people to avail of the benefits of government services and subsidies, including the direct benefit transfer scheme for delivery of subsidized cooking gas. But with the launch of Jan Dhan Yojana—the Bharatiya Janata Party-led NDA’s financial inclusion programme that aims to provide every household with at least one bank account, and which rides on Aadhaar numbers—the government is convinced it is now better equipped to deal with these issues. Earlier this month, the cabinet approved the next phase of the Aadhaar project, involving the extension of the unique identity project to four more states—Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Chhattisgarh and Uttarakhand—a move which will increase the number of people with these numbers to 1 billion by the end of 2015. The Unique Identification Authority of India has so far issued 678.6 million Aadhaar numbers. The government has opened more than 40 million accounts under the Jan Dhan scheme since its launch on 28 August, though around 20-25% of these accounts may belong to multiple members of the same household, said Sandhu. The government plans to seed these bank accounts with Aadhaar to weed out multiple bank accounts under the scheme. However, it is not clear how the government will work around the apex court ruling on Aadhaar. Bank accounts opened under the Jan Dhan Yojana are entitled to an overdraft facility of Rs.5000, a RuPay debit card with a personal accident insurance cover of Rs.1 lakh and a life insurance cover of Rs.30,000. “Banks are worried since once the no-frills accounts are opened, hardly any transaction happens in these accounts. But hopefully as more money comes into these accounts through cash transfers of subsidies, these accounts will see more activity,” said Robin Roy, associate director, financial services, PricewaterhouseCoopers India.