In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, September 3, 2014

5821 - Now, Modi looks to use Aadhaar to track bureaucrats -

Real-time centralised database on attendance to ensure punctuality


Vrishti Beniwal & Sanjeeb Mukherjee  |  New Delhi  August 30, 2014 Last Updated at 23:43 IST

Prime Minister Narendra Modi is planning to track his bureaucrats through a centralised biometric attendance system linked to the Unique Identification Authority of India's (UIDAI's) Aadhaar project.

The new system will allow all government employees to mark their attendance from any central government department, by entering a six-digit unique number, besides finger prints or iris scan. So, a defence ministry bureaucrat who has come to the finance ministry to see his boss, minister Arun Jaitley, can mark his attendance at an Aadhaar-linked machine installed at the entry of North Block.

The data on entry and exit timings of officers and other government staff, to be updated on a real-time basis, are likely to be monitored regularly by the Prime Minister's Office.

"Many government departments already have separate biometric attendance systems but these are hardly used by senior officers. People come late from meetings at other ministries or leave early for meetings elsewhere. Now, such excuses won't work. Data showing the location from where an employee marked his attendance will be available online," said an official who did not wish to be named.

The attendance software is being developed with the UIDAI team's assistance. UIDAI is organising special camps at various government buildings to enrol employees who do not have Aadhaar numbers at present. The department of information technology has written to all government departments to register the details of their employees on the portal, www.attendance.gov.in.

"They have asked us to get Aadhaar for marking attendance. So, one has to be in office on time, even as one rarely gets to leave on time," said a senior government official, complaining.

The biometric system for attendance will be a hardware device, such as an Android tablet. Desktop finger print devices will be installed in the offices of the rank of joint secretaries and above, besides section officers, to avoid rush at attendance terminals on entry gates. According to government estimates, the machines at entry gates might be sufficient for 30 to 40 employees during the 30-minute peak load time. Assuming 50 to 70 per cent employees come during the peak hours, one biometric terminal would be planned for catering to every 50 employees.

"The system will ensure anyone not coming to office but marking proxy attendance is held accountable," another senior government official said. The practice of marking attendance through proxies is more among lower-level employees like peons and clerks. In fact, as a senior official from the agriculture ministry's administrative wing said, there have been instances like a junior peon not attending office for five years but marking attendance all along.

The new system is expected to affect around five million government employees.

Though officials say it is a good move to begin with, not all are pleased. "It is good that the government is introducing a system to check employees' attendance. But coming early to work does not necessarily mean doing substantial work," an official remarked. Another rued that the new government was paying too much attention to these incremental administrative measures, taking away their flexibility, rather than focusing on big reforms.

According to the IT department, the system might initially take 30 seconds to one minute, depending on the number of attempts required. With some practice and training, the time for marking biometric attendance could come down to less than 10 seconds per employee.

Since the Modi government took charge, some government employees say, the metro station at Central Secretariat, where many government offices are located, sees a huge rush around 9 am, as people scramble to reach office in time. On one of these mornings, Information & Broadcasting Minister Prakash Javadekar made a surprise check and pulled up latecomers. On another occasion, Urban Development & Housing Minister Venkaiah Naidu also appeared unannounced and directed all officials and ministry employees to be in their seats by 9 am.

It is not just officials who are finding it hard to adapt to long working hours without any "reward or appreciation", the peons and other clerical staff are also struggling to get into the new mould.

A blog posted on his personal website, www.narendramodi.in, suggests Modi has been putting in 19 work hours a day since taking charge as prime minister. "The same is the case with ministers. Take the case of the newly appointed Minister of State for Home Kiren Rijiju. The young minister himself admitted he had to adjust his sleep pattern keeping in mind the routine and work schedule of the prime minister. Another Cabinet minister, Harsimrat Kaur Badal, recalled how she got a call from the PM at 9:00 am one day telling her she had to meet him in the next 10 minutes," the blog added.