In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, December 1, 2014

7001 - Subir Roy: Who are you, anyway? - Business Standard


There is a veritable 'identity' industry and customer-facing people fixate upon one or the other piece of paper or plastic that is the flavour of the month to either harass people or simply to appear important

Subir Roy  November 28, 2014 Last Updated at 22:40 IST

The young man who came to set up the cable broadband connection in our apartment knew his job and also appeared quite street-smart. After he was done, he handed me a form and explained with an informed air: "You have to fill this up, fix your picture and attach a copy of your voter ID card. If you don't do this within 24 hours, we will cut you off."

When I told him that I did not have a Kolkata voter ID and would a copy of my driving licence do, he looked a bit doubtful. Then, when I showed him that the form listed the driving licence was one of half a dozen permissible options through which I could establish that I was myself, he agreed but continued to look unsatisfied. In his world view, who were you if you did not have a voter ID?

A couple of days later while waiting at a neighbourhood shop that photocopied things, a gentleman ahead of me produced a couple of Aadhaar cards for copying. Still a bit of a novelty, others around took a keen look that said, "We must soon have one of these." A humble-looking person among them seemed the most determined and said he had recently been turned away from a bank that refused to open an account without an Aadhaar card. My assertion that you don't need an Aadhaar card to open a bank account was drowned in a flood of stories of how someone or the other had recently been told to produce an Aadhaar card or get lost.

As if all this wasn't enough, we had just returned from a movie where we were treated not only to ad films on cosmetics and motorbikes but also a longish one that I first thought was on the theme of Incredible India. The scenes were pretty but what was disconcerting was the way everyone kept having mud and dust dumped on them and quite liking it. The final shot established it as a promo on the National Population Register (NPR), the message being - be Indian, be rooted in its soil and get enrolled as an Indian.

The NPR, of course, has a political history. Conceived during the earlier National Democratic Alliance rule, it is meant to fish out illegal immigrants and in intent is similar to various laws brought in by several American states to make it difficult for illegal immigrants to vote. The key criticism about these American states' laws is that they are being used to disenfranchise the minorities and the poor who fear any kind of officialdom and try to keep away from it.

In India today, there is a veritable "identity" industry and customer-facing people fixate upon one or the other piece of paper or plastic that is the flavour of the month to either harass people or simply to appear important. So many people, from the home ministry downwards, earn a livelihood by manning bits of this industry.

What is more serious is if you have to have little bits of paper or plastic that determine whether you are you, then what happens if you lose some or all of those bits of paper. What if you are poor and illiterate and live in a jhuggi jhopri where mysterious fires, with land sharks lurking behind, are not at all unknown?

What if you lose those all important papers in a natural calamity like a flood? And what if you have a Muslim name to boot? Then not even Bhagwan or Allah can help you. This scenario was vividly portrayed in long reports in The Hindu by novelist Amitav Ghosh on the unique situation in which even educated middle-class people in the Andamans suddenly found themselves when the tsunami of 2004 swept away all paperwork that affirmed that they were themselves.

If identity can be established by itself, as in the case of Aadhaar, then that would be some consolation. But the Aadhaar card has to be mailed to some address, and what at times proves an insurmountable hurdle is establishing where you live. When our children moved out to Delhi and Mumbai to study and work and moved in and out of digs whose landlords would not give rent receipts, opening a bank account became a major hurdle for them. And when we moved to Kolkata and unthinkingly I took out the electricity and telephone landline connections in my name, I soon realised I had unpersoned my wife.

Put off by all this, I have decided to put a stop to the unending list of identity proofs that I have and try to avoid going for an Aadhaar card as I neither need nor am I entitled to subsidies. And I wish I could simply show my passport and cast my vote and not have to go for a voter ID.



subirkroy@gmail.com