In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, December 30, 2014

7058 - Purchases over 1 lakh to need PAN, Aadhaar? - TNN

TNN | Dec 13, 2014, 04.50AM IST

The SIT on black money has also recommended that the amount of cash in possession should be capped at Rs 10 or 15 lakh and any amount beyond the threshold be confiscated.

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court-backed special investigation team (SIT) on black money has recommended a series of measures, including quoting of permanent account number for all purchases beyond Rs 1 lakh in addition to submitting an identity proof such as Aadhaar.

The rule, the SIT has suggested, should cover purchases made by cash as well as cheque. It has further recommended that a central "Know Your Customer" (KYC) database be set up which captures details of PAN, passport number or driving licence number, which are often quoted for transactions.

While several suggestions have been made by various experts panel in the past too, the government has been slow in implementing them and cracking down on the use of cash, which the SIT has pointed out also results in terror threats.

It has also recommended that the amount of cash in possession should be capped at Rs 10 or 15 lakh and any amount beyond the threshold be confiscated. The SIT has talked about checks on transportation of illegal wealth.


Justice (retired) MB Shah is heading the SIT to probe black money.

Citing European rules, barring cash transactions beyond a limit, the SIT has said that a similar system should be followed in India as well but the limit should be fixed as the common man's daily transactions are not impacted.

As a strong deterrent, the panel has recommended that tax crimes be made predicate offence with a high tax evasion threshold such as Rs 50 lakh so that it does not cause hardship to small tax payers. The move pushed by the Finance Action Task Force, the global group against money laundering, the underlying crimes that give rise to money laundering. SIT has suggested that this should be brought under Prevention of Money Laundering Act.


The SIT has also underlined the need to tally the Indian export and import data with those of other countries — on a quarterly, if not monthly, basis — as a tool against over-invoicing and under-invoicing.

This it said has been suggested by FATF, which has India as a member.

The SIT to probe black money was constituted a day after Modi government took office.

While pointing out that over- and under-invoicing of export and import is a known source of stashing black money overseas, the Supreme Court-backed panel has also said that bills of export or shipping bills should include a new column on the international price of the goods or the machinery to be shipped out as a possible deterrent.

Further, it has suggested that cross-border wire transfer of funds should be monitored carefully besides making provision of confiscation of property abroad more stringent under FEMA.



While the other moves are meant to track unaccounted cash better, the SIT has also recommended setting up of five additional chief judicial magistrate courts in Mumbai for prosecution of 5,000 pending income tax cases.