AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 7052 - Aadhaar-based cash transfers: Madras HC notice stokes fear of judicial backlash

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, December 29, 2014

7052 - Aadhaar-based cash transfers: Madras HC notice stokes fear of judicial backlash - Business Standard

Aadhaar-based cash transfers: Madras HC notice stokes fear of judicial backlash

An earlier version of the scheme had to be stopped after SC observed Aadhaar numbers could not be made mandatory for availing of benefits

Sudheer Pal Singh | New Delhi December 12, 2014 Last Updated at 00:45 IST

The fear of a judicial backlash against the government’s attempt to revive the Aadhaar-linked direct benefits transfer of LPG (DBTL) subsidy returned on Wednesday, with a division Bench of the Madras High Court issuing notices to the cabinet secretary, petroleum secretary and the Oil and Natural Gas Corporation (ONGC) chairman in this regard.

A public interest suit was filed in the Madurai bench of the court, challenging the central government’s move to link Aadhaar and bank account details with domestic gas cylinder connections, as part of the DBT scheme. The petitioner, Sivakasi-based advocate S M Anantha Murugan, called for restraining the scheme as the Supreme Court had earlier restrained oil companies from demanding Aadhaar card numbers for liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) cylinders.

Business Standard had on October 28 reported that Solicitor-General Ranjit Kumar had advised against resuming cash transfers in cooking gas without taking the Supreme Court’s approval. The government should first place the report of a committee appointed to study the scheme before the court and seek a modification in its ruling, he had advised. A senior petroleum ministry official had recently said the ministry would approach the court if the need arose. An earlier version of the scheme was rolled out by the previous government in June last year which had to be stopped after the Supreme Court observed Aadhaar numbers could not be made mandatory for availing of benefits from the government. The scheme had already been rolled out in 292 districts by then and the government had transacted via Aadhaar about Rs 5,000 crore to beneficiaries.

A modified version of the DBT scheme was launched by the new government in 54 districts across 11 states, covering 23.3 million households, on November 15, to reduce diversion of subsidised domestic cooking gas. The new scheme does not make an Aadhaar number mandatory. Currently, the Aadhaar generation level in the 54 chosen districts stands at 95 per cent. Under the new scheme, consumers without Aadhaar numbers can receive cash directly in their bank accounts. However, they may have to shift to an Aadhaar-based cash transfer system when they get their Aadhaar numbers. Also, consumers not cash transfer-compliant (CTC) get a three-month grace period, during which they receive the cylinders at a subsidised rate.

To ensure LPG consumers have extra cash to pay for the first LPG cylinder at market price, a permanent advance is to be paid to them as soon as they make their first cylinder booking after joining the scheme.