In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, January 3, 2015

7133 - LPG benefit transfer to roll out today - Business Standard



Surabhi Agarwal & Sudheer Pal Singh  |  New Delhi  January 1, 2015 Last Updated at 00:46 IST

The government will roll out Direct Benefit Transfer (DBT) for cooking gas across 676 districts on the first day of the new year, despite preparations on the ground being dissatisfactory.

Of the 153 million liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) customers in the country, only 63 million, or 43 per cent, have been linked to the new system so far under which cooking gas subsidy will be transferred directly into the bank accounts of the beneficiaries.

Government officials, however, defended the situation by saying they do not anticipate problems, since the customers will get three months of "grace" period to migrate to the new system. However, it was because of ground-level implementation issues that DBT in LPG was stopped at its first roll-out during the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government. The scale of the project that time was only half of what it is now - it covered only 292 districts.

The National Democratic Alliance (NDA) government restarted DBTL in 54 districts in mid-November. So far, the department of petroleum has transferred subsidy worth Rs 624 crore to the bank accounts of two million customers.

States with high linkage of LPG connections and bank accounts include Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Maharashtra, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh. The ministry of petroleum needs to catch up in Odisha, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. A government official said preparedness at the ground level was not bad as the government had learnt its lessons from the previous time.

"There is more communication, better control over information and grievance redressal mechanisms have also been improved," said the official.

The ministry of petroleum has a much better hold over the project now than last time and has been closely monitoring the progress through regular communication with the district collectors, said the official.

Also, under the current scheme, consumers will get three months of grace period to link their connections with a bank account and Aadhaar. And, even after March, if their bank account details are not available, they will have to buy the LPG cylinder at the market price. However, the subsidy for the next three months will be stored in an escrow account, which they will receive as soon as they link their connections.

"So, they will not lose the subsidy but it will start pinching them. And we expect people to come onboard then," said the first official.

Under the current scheme, linking the beneficiaries' bank account with Aadhaar is not mandatory even though the government is encouraging consumers to link their connections with both bank accounts and the UID number.

Linking with Aadhaar is expected to weed out fakes and duplicates from the system. Out of the over 60 million consumers linked so far, 50 million have furnished both bank account and Aadhaar number details, while the rest 10 million have linked the connections through their bank accounts only.

Another official added that the numbers are increasing rapidly. "Instead of mass level campaigning, the government has chosen to do subtle messaging this time through SMSs etc, which is more targeted," said the second official.

Aadhaar has so far enrolled 728 million people and claims to have covered 75 per cent of the population in 16 states and union territories including Kerala, Himachal Pradesh and Delhi among others.