In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 28, 2015

7264 - A K Bhattacharya: A simple matter of conviction - Business Standard


Three recent initiatives kicked off with renewed vigour to improve governance were actually started, perhaps in a different format, by the UPA government

A K Bhattacharya  January 25, 2015 Last Updated at 22:48 IST


One relatively easy way of assessing how the government has tried to address the difficult challenge of governance as well as fiscal prudence will be to take a look at what it has done with respect to delivering subsidies to those who need them the most. Three initiatives in the past few months, apparently unrelated to each other, deserve scrutiny in this context.

The first initiative pertains to the fillip given to the Aadhaar network of creating biometrics-based identity for the country's residents. The scheme has got fresh momentum and the latest number on its coverage is estimated at 750 million, or over 60 per cent of the country's total population. In May 2014, when the Narendra Modi government was formed, the total number of Aadhaar-enrolled people was 632 million or a little over 50 per cent of the population.

The performance in some states is worth a close look. Uttar Pradesh, with a total population base of around 200 million, was brought under the Aadhaar scheme in early 2014 and by now about 75 million have been enrolled. Already, it has covered about 38 per cent of the state's population and the pace of enrolments is expected to increase in the coming months as more agencies are being hired to implement the scheme.

Several states and Union Territories, including Kerala, Punjab, Haryana, Telangana, Andhra Pradesh, Delhi and Himachal Pradesh have already seen coverage of well over 90 per cent of their population. The coverage in Maharashtra and Jharkhand is now over 80 per cent. And other states such as West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, Rajasthan and Gujarat have covered between two-thirds and three-fourths of their respective population under Aadhaar. Even Odisha's Aadhaar coverage is 61 per cent.

The second initiative is what is popularly known as the Jan Dhan Yojana. The current government gave this a big push with Prime Minister Narendra Modi using his Independence Day address to announce the scheme that would provide banking facilities to those who are deprived of the benefits of financial inclusion and access. The target at the launch of the scheme, according to the government, was to open 75 million new accounts by January 26, 2015. By the middle of January, the number of accounts opened under the scheme has crossed 115 million. One may doubt how many of these 115 million accounts have been actually opened now or whether these include already those who have been covered with a bank account. But the figure of 115 million new accounts is huge and even after adjusting for the inflated numbers, if at all there is any, there should not be any doubt about the scale of the operation or its success.

The third initiative is what is now popularly known as the Pratyaksh Hastantarit Labh or Pahal, which allows consumers of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) to claim their subsidies directly through their bank accounts. This is the same scheme that the United Progressive Alliance (UPA) government had launched as the Direct Benefits Transfer scheme and had later halted its implementation as it met with some legal and procedural challenges.

The Modi government, however, renamed it as Pahal and revived it by relaunching it in 54 districts in mid-November of 2014. The objective of the scheme was to seed the 150 million LPG connections with bank accounts. At that time, only about a quarter of all the cooking gas connections were seeded with banks accounts, where the subsidy amount would be directly transferred, preventing leakage. In the last two months, the coverage has increased to include 90 million connections or about 60 per cent of the households that have a cooking gas connection. Of this, 55 million are Aadhaar-compliant or have an Aadhaar number. And by March, the entire 150 million gas connections are expected to be brought under Pahal. Already, over Rs 7,200 crore in gas subsidies has been transferred to the bank accounts of households covered under Pahal. Remember that the whole of India has around 240 million households, of which 150 million gas consumers would be covered under Pahal, with their bank accounts receiving the subsidies directly.

All these schemes should help improve governance and rationalise subsidies. A large number of the new schemes for delivering services to over two-thirds of the population by March 2015 and eventually to everybody in the country can be rolled out with virtually no scope for misuse, diversion or leakage. And the irony is that all the three schemes were actually started, perhaps in a different format, by the UPA government. The Modi government made a big difference by showing conviction in them and giving them a big push