In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

7161 - LPG plan tides over hiccups - Telegraph India


LPG plan tides over hiccups

Our Correspondent

Patna, Jan. 3: The LPG subsidy scheme has started gaining momentum after initial hiccups witnessed in the first two days regarding credit of the subsidy amount in bank accounts of beneficiaries.

The scheme was launched on January 1. Gas companies have claimed that all glitches in the central server, its connection with the cylinder distributors and the software being used under this scheme have been done away with.

"The central server was working with the launch of the scheme in 54 districts in the country from November 14 last year. It was just some synchronisation and connectivity issues with few of the distributors on first day of the launch of the scheme on January 1. However, all such issues have been resolved and the subsidy amount is now getting credited in the bank account of the beneficiaries," said Arvind Kumar Gupta, deputy general manager (LPG), Indian Oil Corporation Limited (IOCL).

Earlier called the direct benefit transfer for LPG (DBTL) scheme and now Pahal (Pratyaksh Hanstantarit Labh), the system is meant to ensure that the subsidy reaches genuine customers.

Under the scheme, a consumer has to buy cylinders at market price throughout the year. However, for the first 12 bookings, the government subsidy, depending upon the market price of a cylinder on the booking date, will be transferred to the consumer's bank account when an order is placed for a refill. When the cylinder is delivered at his home, he has to pay the market rate of the cylinder.

The amount of advance to be credited against the first booking of the cylinder after a consumer enrols under Pahal scheme has been fixed at Rs 568. In case of subsequent cylinders, the subsidy amount to be credited in the bank of the beneficiaries would depend on the change in the respective market prices between the time of booking and delivery.

For instance, the market price of a cylinder in Patna is Rs 825 at present, whereas subsidised rate of the same is Rs 441. Thus, the differential amount of Rs 378.88 would be transferred to the beneficiaries in the subsequent bookings.

Consumers, who wish to join the scheme, are required to either link their Aadhaar number into their bank account and their LPG consumer ID. If they do not possess Aadhaar number, they are required to link their bank account directly with their 17- digit LPG ID.

Bihar has 56.73 lakh LPG consumers, of which 39 per cent have already become cash transfer-compliant. IOCL officials claimed around 30 per cent of their consumers in the state have been enrolled under Pahal, whereas officials from Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (BPCL) claimed the corresponding consumer coverage under this scheme to be 53.18 per cent.

Though the initial deadline for enrolling under Pahal was December 31 last year, the government has given a grace period till March 31, during which consumers who have not linked their bank and gas accounts will continue to get the cylinder at subsidised rate at the time of delivery. After March, all consumers, irrespective of whether or not the consumers have enrolled under DBTL, would be charged at market price for buying cylinders.