In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, January 14, 2015

7164 - Papering Over the Go-Green Initiative - Indian Express

By P Subramanian
Published: 05th January 2015 06:00 AM

I ordered a phone from an online store. The store informed me through email that the consignment would be delivered within 48 hours. They also said that as part of their go-green initiative, they would not be sending the invoice with the consignment. A soft copy of the invoice would be sent by email after delivery of the consignment. The phone in its original factory packing was put in a bubble top wrapper and placed in a cardboard box. The consignment note pasted on the box had my name, address, description of goods, quantity and price of the product. Much paper was used up while claiming to save trees by omitting the invoice alone.

My friend Doss works in an office specialising in garnering taxes. Last year, he proudly announced that his office was fully computerised and the public could access the web portal sitting in their homes/offices and file documents and pay taxes. After a few months, I asked him whether his office became paperless.

 He shook his head remorsefully and said the quantum of paper used by his office had increased. I wondered how that was possible. Doss said, “The audit department insists on hard copies of every document filed by customers for auditing.”

The government decided that LPG subsidy would be credited directly to the customers’ bank accounts. The LPG customers were asked to fill up forms and attach copies of Aadhaar with the forms. Photocopying shops near the banks and gas agencies did brisk business, because banks and gas agencies insisted on hard copies of Aadhaar when all that was required was the Aadhaar number alone to synchronise the accounts online.

When I approached a village officer to pay land tax, he advised me to apply for an electronic patta and pay tax online. When I asked him how to go about it, he said I should write an application addressed to the tehsildar, enclosing copies of the title deed, tax receipt, patta and encumbrance certificate. I reckoned I had to make a set of documents running to at least 10 pages of A3 size paper to convert my paper patta into electronic form. Alas, we create paperwork in order to rid an office of paper.

I deposited some money in a post office six years ago to earn monthly income. When I went to the post master for collecting the matured amount, he asked me to produce proof of identity and residence to satisfy KYC norms. I informed him that KYC was complied with at the time of opening the account. But the official was not satisfied with my reply. I had to submit self-attested copies of proof of identity/residence and show the originals to satisfy the official’s exuberance to accumulate paper in his office.


Paperless offices seem to be a far cry, since some jacks-in-office want to retain hard copies of documents seen by them. One can be sure shredders would be in great demand to dispose off redundant stacks of paper gathering dust in e-governed organisations.