In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, February 3, 2015

7299 - Revenge of the babu: Will PM Modi's insistence on punctuality hurt BJP in Delhi? - First Post

by Sanjay Singh  Jan 30, 2015 13:39 IST

The introduction of a bio-metric system to register entry-exit time and a strict adherence to reporting for duty at 9 in morning may arguably have improved work culture in government offices and pleased a number of people, but the new measures by the Modi government have deeply annoyed substantive sections of  government employees.

They are extremely upset that they even had to report to work on Gandhi Jayanti for Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s cherished Swacch Abhiyan, and also about the rigour some of them had to undergo for his other pet schemes like Jan Dhan Yojna and ensuring that his interaction with children went live on Teachers Day.

AFP

Firstpost spoke to a a cross section of employees and found that for once these grievances are not group or class specific. There is a rare unanimity of views on this matter between both highly officious IAS and lowly class IV peons. In fact, this angst is greater among middle and lower ranking employees because most of them have to travel longer distances to get to work. 

Added to that was the rumour, further stressed by the Aam Admi Party that a BJP government in Delhi would reduce retirement age to 58. The newly elected BJP government in Haryana did it two months ago. In fact, PM Modi had to devote few minutes to the issue,  clarifying or denying “manufactured lies” and asserting that no such move was in the offing.

It’s true that pampered and relatively secure government employees have got used to a lethargic, leisurely mood centric work culture and their arguments may be devoid of any merit and completely misplaced. However it's election time in Delhi and they have a chance to vent out their anger. And in terms of numbers, they are quite significant.

As per the Census of Employees 2011 figures,  There are around 1.5 lakh regular employees affiliated to the Delhi government and various autonomous bodies. Another few thousand are contract and ad-hoc employees.

The Census Enquiries for regular employment suggest that as on 31 March, 2009, Delhi housed 6.55 percent of India's 31 lakh regular central government employees. That means there are over two lakh central government employees in Delhi. Add that to the number of employees in the Delhi government, and the figure goes up to around five lakh government employees, if contractual employment is included in the same category.

The BJP, however, has a silver lining.

Despite the disgruntlement, many employees don’t think Arvind Kejriwal’s Aam Admi Party is a good alternative to the BJP. 

Returning to Congress’s fold could have been an option but since the party is out of the reckoning, they don’t want to waste their votes. The other option, as some suggest is to sit idle and not vote.


The BJP, AAP or for that matter the Congress’s challenge now will be to make them come out and vote in their favour.

The other area of BJP concern would be the AAP making inroads in rural areas of Delhi, particularly among Jat voters in Outer Delhi. In the last elections the AAP had drawn a blank in this region. But since then they have roped in their Harayana unit leaders to work with voters, and their Gramin Morcha has also been very active. In the last elections the Jats had decisively favoured the BJP not only in Delhi but also in Rajasthan and UP in subsequent parliamentary elections.

If AAP is trying to poach the BJP’s Jats votes, the BJP is working hard to make a significant dent to AAP’s outreach among Dalit voters.

Twelve of Delhi's 70 assembly seats are reserved for Scheduled Castes. The community forms nearly 25 percent of the total 1.3 crore voters. Previously the community was split between the Congress and the BSP, but in the last elections, AAP emerged as their favourites and made huge gains in reserved seats, winning nine. The BJP could win only two. But Modi beginning his cleanliness drive from a Balmiki (dalit) locality and their subsequent pitch holding various meetings and roping in Udit Raj (already a party MP) and Krishna Tirath (Congress’s dalit face in the Capital) may boost its prospects.

The fact the BJP is going in 'all guns blazing' in the last week of campaigning is a pointer that the party is not willing to take any chances. The Delhi polls have become hugely prestigious for it.

Though Kiran Bedi’s integration with the party and its thought process continues to be a concern for the leadership,  the party is trying to give an impression that it is working cohesively, by marshalling all its troops for the final leg of the polls. The voices of potential dissent have been silenced but the problem is that party workers were not feeling ignited, something that was in complete contrast to the December 2013 assembly polls or the May 2014 parliamentary polls.


The BJP also has to watch out for the Middle Class. ALthough they may have recaptured some of the votes of this section, they may no longer possess the same degree of enthusiasm that saw them standing in long queues to vote. The party hopes that the momentum generated by Modi’s rallies in different parts of the city, beginning from January 31 would correct these fault lines.