In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, February 23, 2015

7428 - FLYING A WISH LIST KITE - Mumbai Mirror

By Ajit Ranade, Mumbai Mirror | Feb 21, 2015, 12.00 AM IST

Union Finance Minister Arun Jaitley will present the budget on February 28

Some not so radical ideas for the Finance Minister to consider for next week's Union budget.

The most watched television event that is not an India Pakistan cricket match is the Union budget speech. Given by the Finance Minister (FM), it will start at 11 AM next Saturday. By now, you have read about all the expectations piled up on the FM's shoulders. The stock market is going a bit crazy (as always). 

India is touted to become the fastest growing economy next year, even ahead of China. To add to the boisterousness, here is a wacky wish list. There is a good chance that none of these wishes will be granted, but it's worth flying akite, anyway. So here goes:

(A) Can we start taxing agricultural income? 
Sure, most of the poverty in India is confined to rural areas, and in agriculture. But there are many rich farmers too. If you look at the crorepatis in Parliament, many of them describe their occupation as agriculturist. In fact many do not even report a Permanent Account Number, implying that they do not pay income tax. Presumably, if all their income is from farming, then they don't pay any income tax. But the time has come to examine this. Shouldn't we address this holy cow? Sure, this will need a constitutional amendment. But since 14 per cent of national income is from agriculture, we can't let that entire amount remain untaxed.

(B) Can we introduce Demat Gold, a la Kisan Vikas Patra (KVP)? You can buy KVP from any post office or retail outlets. Imagine if you could buy a piece of paper called Demat Gold (DG) for Rs 5,000. This is equivalent to 2 grams of gold. You can redeem it any day, and get back money equal to that day's price of 2 grams of gold. So it is as if the DG is like actual gold, except that it isn't. You can't convert it into a necklace, but it protects you from inflation. Since it is paper, it is much simpler to administer, as compared to a physical gold deposit scheme. It is alsi gold, and maybe we can persuade Mr. Amitabh Bachchan to be its brand ambassador. If this DG scheme succeeds, it can potentially reduce gold imports by 20 per cent, thereby saving 10 billion dollars (60,000 crore rupees) in foreign exchange.

(C) Can we make Aadhaar compulsory for all subsidy payments? 
The total amount given out in subsidies is more than Rs 2.5 lakh crore. Except for cooking gas subsidy, which is now linked to a bank account, the remaining is not explicitly targeted. We spend close to Rs 1 lakh crore on fertiliser subsidy. This is presumably to help poor farmers, but most of it gets cornered by rich states like Punjab and Haryana. In fact fertiliser usage is very low in eastern states like Bihar and Orissa. Can we not explore payment of fertiliser subsidy into the bank account of the farmer directly? After all, 99 per cent of households in the country have a bank account, thanks to Jan Dhan Yojana. By a combination of Aadhaar and JDY we should be able to target subsidies better.

(D) Can we introduce a carbon tax? 
Thirteen of the 20 most polluted cities in the world are in India. This is mostly because of vehicular pollution, congested traffic, idling engines and subsidised diesel. The harmful fumes are inhaled by slum dwelling babies on the roadside, which permanently damages their brain, and their future earning prospects. Delhi is the worst, despite a ban on diesel in public vehicles. The time has come to impose a carbon tax, so we at least pay the price of polluting the atmosphere with vehicular fuel.

(E) Can we make interest income tax free, just like dividends from companies? If not fully, at least up to a limit of Rs 50,000? This will encourage more savings, and more utilization of the banking channel.

Wishing the FM a super Saturday... and you all a stress free budget.