In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, February 26, 2015

7441 - Centre takes steps to convert PDS to cash transfers

Centre takes steps to convert PDS to cash transfers

UTs to do it first; pilots in select urbanised districts of states

Nitin Sethi & Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  February 24, 2015 Last Updated at 00:57 IST


The Union government has remained equivocal in public about the Shanta Kumar report and whether the National Democratic Alliance intends to follow up and change the National Food Security Act. But at least on one count it has moved fast to implement the report - converting the subsidised food supply into cash transfers under the Direct Benefits Transfer Scheme. 

The food ministry has written to the Union Territories to shift from physical supply of subsidised foodgrain to cash transfers. It is also readying plans to pilot this shift in some states, focusing first on urban areas.

Business Standard reviewed letters written by the Union food ministry to the state and Union Territory governments on the issue. The letter sent on February 10 reads, "Government is looking forward to implement DBT for food grains initially in Union Territories and few districts of the states on pilot basis."

The Shanta Kumar committee, meant to reform the management of the Food Corporation of India, had gone much further ahead and recommended that the government should progressively move away from distributing food and towards cash transfers. It had also recommended that the subsidy for food should be restricted to a maximum of 40 per cent of the population instead of the existing minimum 67 per cent limit under the National Food Security Act. Since then, food ministry officials have claimed off the record the government would not go for the 40 per cent cut-off limit but they have not publicly clarified the government's stand on all the recommendations of the high-level panel set up by the NDA government.

The first evidence that the government is moving fast on implementing other parts of the report comes from letters written by the food ministry to the states on converting the physical distribution of subsidised grain to cash transfers.

NDA has offered the states and the Union Territories three ways to convert the subsidised food supply to cash transfers. One option provided is that cash is transferred to the bank accounts of beneficiaries every month and they are left to purchase the foodgrain from the market. In the second option, the ration shops would be provided grains at near market prices or at minimum support price (that the farmers get for their produce). The people will be then asked to buy this grain at the market rates and the difference between the central issue price (the rate at which the Centre releases subsidised grain to the state for PDS) and the market price would be deposited in the beneficiaries' accounts. In the third option, the governments would continue to provide the subsidised grain but the authentication of beneficiaries would be done through Aadhaar and an electronic database.

Sources said the government was keen to move the Union Territories and urban areas towards the first option as it was difficult to ensure supply of grains in rural India without state intervention.

The issue of substituting cash for foodgrain has been a political hot potato since the UPA regime days and continues to be so in the present NDA government. "The decisions are more political in approach," said a government official privy to the plans.

Some states, such as Andhra Pradesh have linked their PDS mechanism to Aadhaar cards but only for authenticating beneficiaries not for converting cheap foodgrain supply to cash transfers.

The NDA government has asked that states TO completely digitise their data of beneficiaries - referred to as priority households or BPL households - and then link the Aadhaar numbers of the beneficiaries with these cards.

In its letter, the ministry has said, "The complete digitisation of beneficiary data and Aadhaar seeding is a precondition."

The ministry has held one video-conference on the issue with the states and Union Territories and also held a meeting of the UT administration with the DBT authorities to fast-pace the process. The Union Territories were told in February to identify which of the three options they would go with and have a comprehensive plan ready to implement the conversion of food grains supply to cash transfers by the end of the month. All the states have been asked to provide monthly reports to the Centre on how they are implementing these changes
.