In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, May 1, 2015

7851 - Benami property: Follow Britain, Australia and take on Torrens system of direct registration - Economic Times

April 24, 2015, 4:43 AM IST Hema Ramakrishnan in Exchequer | India, Times View | ET

The government is getting ready with its Brahmastra. It will soon introduce anew version of a 27-year-old law to unearth benami property, or property held in the name of someone other than the actual owner.

A brainchild of former Congress law minister P Shiv Shankar, the Benami Transaction (Prohibition) Act, was passed by Parliament in 1988. The story pretty much turned out like the boy who cried wolf. The law was never enforced although successive governments vowed to write rules to punish abenami property-holder. The file even went missing mysteriously once but resurfaced only to gather dust in North Block.

Version 2.0 will be much more stringent. That’s what Jayant Sinha, minister of state for finance, told Lok Sabha. He said the law will enable confiscation of benami property and provide for prosecution, blocking a major avenue for generation and holding of black money in the form of benami property, especially in real estate.

Agreed, benami transactions, speculative in nature, push up demand in the property market and fuel prices. But to expect the new avatar of an old law to be a serious threat to the black economy is plain naive. The cure for the disease lies elsewhere: land market reforms, issuing an Aadhaar to every Indian citizen, tax reform that includes bringing property deals under the goods and services tax (GST) and making poll-funding transparent.

To end speculation in property, the government needs to do away with the artificial shortage of land, which is policy-induced, and free more land for urban development. It’s baffling why, say, government departments like Indian Railways and defence sit on huge unused tracts of land. Also, there is no reason why many states persist with an outdated classification of whether land is for farming or for setting up factories. Absurd rules on usage should go.

All states should modernise land records to enhance transparency in ownership. Already, some state governments capture electronic records of land ownership, which is akin to dematerialising shares. Conclusive titling must also be ensured as presumptive titles lead to frauds and under-reporting of the value of land deals. India should follow Britain and Australia and take on the Torrens system of direct registration of title in a central registry. For that, all the parcels of land will have to be entered in a register with the owner specified. The state has to guarantee ownership and become the keeper of land and title records. Benami deals will drop dramatically when the title becomes a certificate of valid ownership.

The UPA’s draft model Bill on land titling sought to provide conclusive titles. It also required every state to establish a Land Titling Authority to write rules, create and update the register of titles, assign a unique identity number to each piece of land and provide valuation details, if need be. Narendra Modi government should revive the Bill. As land is a state subject, all states should come on board to implement the reform to improve governance. Land market reforms must top India’s agenda.
The government should also issue a unique identification number to all citizens, like the social security number in the US. Aadhaar fits the bill perfectly, and can be linked to property deeds, not just bank accounts. The Supreme Court, which is against making Aadhaar mandatory, should see reason. The tax information network and a foolproof permanent account number (PAN) also enables tracking of fund flows to and from any bank account and establish audit trails. Benami deals will be difficult when every citizen has an Aadhaar. This will obviate the need for a mandatory PAN.

Bringing the real estate sector into GST is also a good idea. The suggestion, made by a task force of the Thirteenth Finance Commission, would mean subsuming stamp duties levied by states into GST. Credit for the taxes paid on inputs would be available once this is done, creating audit trails. This will cut out benami deals.

We need action on all these fronts to stem the generation of black money, rather than introduce the so-called black money Bill and another law to punish benami property-holders in the country. Whether a property is benami or not is a question of fact. The onus of proving whether the property is benami will rest with the government. All this would mean lot more work for the enforcement agency (read: tax administration) that is already under flak for its arbitrariness.

Nothing, apart from political posturing, explains the tearing hurry to adopt new laws whose enforcement pose huge challenges. It could also incur the wrath of farmers, up in arms against the land Bill. We don’t need a throwback to inspector raj days.


DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.