In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 20, 2015

7999 - Govt mulls linking DBT schemes to one account - Business Standard


Transferring all subsidies into single account could reduce subsidy leakage

Jayshree P Upadhyay & Deepak Patel  |  New Delhi  May 19, 2015 Last Updated at 00:30 IST

In a bid to plug subsidy leakage, the finance ministry is planning to link all Direct Benefits Transfer (DBT) schemes into one account.

According to sources, the Department of Economic Affairs has written to the Department of Financial Services seeking comments on ways to prevent subsidy leakage.

“Allowing all the subsidies an individual is entitled to should be transferred to only one account, as against multiple accounts that are linked to different schemes; this would reduce leakage of subsidy leakage,” said a senior official.

Leakages refer to the subsidised goods that do not reach the intended beneficiary. Leakages not only have the direct costs of wastage, but also the opportunity cost of how the government could otherwise have deployed its fiscal resources.

This move is part of the JAM (Jan Dhan, Aadhaar and Mobile) trinity, which was proposed in the economic survey for FY16 to prevent subsidy leakage. “If  the JAM Number Trinity can be seamlessly linked, and all subsidies rolled into one or a few monthly transfers, real progress in terms of direct income support to the poor may finally be possible,” stated the Economic Survey for 2015-16.

The finance ministry believes that transferring all subsidies in one account will reduce the monthly transfer of subsidies substantially in some cases to as low as one monthly transfer. 

“Our endeavour is to reduce any duplicity while transferring direct benefits to consumers and we are mulling on ways to reduce that. One such step is to transfer all the subsidies in one bank account. However, we want more accounts to be Aadhaar-seeded,” said another ministry official.

As of December 2014, about 720 million citizens had been allocated an Aadhaar card. These enrolments are increasing at 20 million a month. The government had seeded about 100 million bank accounts with registered Aadhaaar numbers by December 2014. The government currently transfers cooking gas subsidy to nearly 100 million consumers directly to their banks accounts.

Of the 120 million accounts opened under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, 40 per cent are linked to Aadhaar and according to officials, more accounts are being linked. Nearly 36 DBT schemes are linked to bank accounts and subsidy is directly transferred in these

According to the survey, 41 per cent of the subsidies transferred through kerosene sold in ration shops were lost due to leakage. The fiscal cost of excess transfer of subsidy on kerosene led to a loss of Rs 10,044 crore for 2011-12. “Value of the fiscal savings - due to lower leakages is eight times greater than the cost of implementing the programme,” stated the survey.