In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, May 15, 2015

7955 - Four financial inclusion schemes and one Aadhaar card - Live Mint


It may be a good idea to get your domestic staff, service providers and vendors to enrolled


Shyamal Banerjee/Mint

Suddenly everybody’s heard of the Pradhan Mantri schemes. The driver knows about it, so does the housekeeper, the sweeper, the plumber, the “pressguy” and the fruitwala. Some bank branches are buzzing—long queues and lots of excited chatter. What’s up? We could call it the Modi push. 

On 9 May, he launched three financial inclusion schemes that offer life cover, accident insurance and pension. These ride on the first Modi push—the Jan Dhan Yojana, under which 125 million bank accounts were opened by 31 January 2015. This, in turn, rides on the Aadhaar unique identity card. With more than 810 million unique identity numbers covering 67% of residents in India already issued, the base for a large-scale financial inclusion programme has been built.

Pradhan Mantri Jeevan Jyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY) is a group life insurance pure term scheme that costs Rs.330 a year for a life cover of Rs.2 lakh. People between ages of 18 and 50 can enter. The cover continues till age 55. There is a case to extend the cover till age 60 or 65 at least, and not terminate at age 55, given that the average Indian age is now 68. Life Insurance Corp. of India, or any other willing insurance company, can offer the scheme through a bank. I checked around and found that HDFC Standard Life Insurance Co. Ltd has already sold almost 50,000 policies through HDFC Bank Ltd and other banks. ICICI Prudential Life Insurance Co. Ltd is offering the product through ICICI Bank Ltd. The process is simple and tech-enabled and should get traction, says an ICICI Prudential insider. SBI Life Insurance Co. Ltd is offering it through State Bank of India (SBI) and Vijaya Bank. According to SBI officials, till 9 May, SBI had already sold 2 million policies. Kotak Mahindra Old Mutual Life Insurance Ltd is going to begin soon and will vend it through Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. The bank will be the master policy holder.

The second scheme, Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY), is an accident insurance scheme that gives Rs.2 lakh if the policy holder dies in an accident or is disabled due to an accident. At Rs.12 per year, the product is really cheap.

The third scheme is the Atal Pension Yojana (APY), which will give a defined benefit contribution of a maximum of Rs.5,000 for defined contributions. This is a watered down version of the National Pension System-Swavalamban (NPS-S), whose subscribers will automatically be migrated to APY. But an opt-out is there for those who want to continue with NPS-S.

The design, execution and delivery of the schemes point to a new pragmatism in the government. Simply announcing schemes in a budget speech and then waiting for the leaky, sleepy system to deliver does not work. 

The life product is right—a pure term plan—the best value-for-money insurance that anybody can buy. It is what is called an OTC (over-the-counter) product—it does not take five pages of legalese to explain the benefit; anybody can understand and buy. The accident cover is simple, cheap and easy to understand. 

The pension product is more nuanced and the jury is still out to see if it works at the ground level. It is not enough to get the right product; it also has to be made available at a mass level. 

That has been done by linking the security schemes to the bank account, which is linked to the Aadhaar number. Connect the dots and you have a robust, executable system of financial inclusion. 

If the first step was to open bank accounts through the Jan Dhan Yojana, this is the next step, to make the bank accounts active by making banks vend a product that will get people to queue up. Auto debit of premiums will ensure that the policies are kept alive and that people are forced to start using their bank accounts.

To get results, targets have been fixed. Banking insiders tell me that a target of 1,000 policies per banking staff has been fixed for both the schemes. Banks will get a transaction fee of Rs.11 (3% commission), and agents and business correspondents get Rs.30 (9% commission) for the life cover. For the accident cover, banks, agents and business correspondents get Rs.1 (8% commission). The responsibility of claim management will rest on the banks or the other vendors. That part will unfold as claims begin to come, and banks will have to strengthen their third-party product teams.

The overall comment from inside the financial sector that I could tap into is this: these are great schemes and will do much for building social security in India. A government with a budget deficit has got the corporate sector to initially pick up the tab—social security through the corporations. Whether corporate profit will get hit will be known once the claims experience builds over the next three years—the premiums are frozen for three years—after which either a re-pricing or a government dole could happen. But an insurance expert I spoke to said that given the scale of this plan, the schemes will be profitable.
It may be a good idea to get your domestic staff, service providers and vendors to open these accounts. And as you do that, examine your own portfolio of financial products and compare costs. If you’re paying a whole lot more, maybe it is time to redo your own financial life with sensible products rather than the junk you are sold.


Monika Halan works in the area of financial literacy and financial intermediation policy and is a certified financial planner. She is editor, Mint Money, Yale World Fellow 2011 and on the board of FPSB India. She can be reached at expenseaccount@livemint.com