In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

7952 - - Online verification to end hassle of chasing officers - Telegraph India

Monalisa Chaudhuri




A set of three identity documents, at least one of them verifiable over the Internet, would spare Tatkal passport applicants the hassle of getting a authentication certificate from "a competent authority", according to a new proposal.

An Aadhaar card, along with two identity documents from a list of 16 mentioned in the official website of the Passport Seva portal, would suffice to support a Tatkal application if the person fails to procure the said certificate, the ministry of external affairs (MEA) has recommended.

The first step towards making the Tatkal passport procedure easier yet foolproof was a pilot project launched in Delhi last month to link Aadhaar data with the Passport Seva system. Ranchi and five more regional passport offices across India - Ahmedabad, Bangalore, Chandigarh, Chennai and Vizag - joined the network on Monday, enabling passport officials to check a person's Aadhaar details online.

Regional passport officer, Ranchi, Sanatan confirmed that they had had a trial run on Saturday and officially joined the network on Monday. "The Aadhaar number of an applicant on his form is now leading us to a link where we can download the original card for verification," he said.

Finding an official authorised to vouch for an applicant's credentials is the toughest part of applying for a Tatkal passport, more so after several bureaucrats have been blacklisted for allegedly issuing false verification certificates.

"If anyone submits an endorsement letter from officers of SP-rank, director of any department or deputy commissioner and so on, we demand a copy of the official's current ID and the letter should be drafted on his/her letterhead. Often these authentication certificates are forged. So, we write back to officers concerned for reconfirmation before processing Tatkal passport," the regional passport officer explained the cumbersome process.

Sanatan agreed that integration of the Aadhaar database with the Passport Seva system would have multiple benefits. "We will be able to verify the credentials of an applicant online through Aadhaar and two other identity documents matching those mentioned in the list. Once that happens, we don't need Annexure F (the format for a verification certificate) for a Tatkal application," he added.

Data regarding other identity documents such as a voter ID would be made available to passport officials digitally, enabling quick verification of Tatkal passport applications.

EPIC (elector's photo identity card) data can currently be verified on the EC website but it needs to be made available to passport officials over a protected network. "More the number of Internet-verifiable documents, greater the authenticity of the applicant's information. It also reduces the chances of forgery," a Passport Seva functionary said.

ID cards of government employees, SC/ST/OBC certificates and property documents are some of the others mentioned in the list of 16.

The MEA had previously tried to replace the verification certificate with a bunch of identity documents but the plan was aborted after multiple cases of forgery were reported by regional passport offices.

Annexure F is currently mandatory to back up a Tatkal application although the official website www.passportindia.gov.in mentions that "any three documents" from a list of 16 can be presented in lieu of a verification certificate.

Many applicants are confused by web information. "It is mentioned that three identity documents can replace Annexure F for a Tatkal application. I took the necessary documents along to appear for my interview at the Passport Seva Kendra, only to be told that Annexure F was mandatory," an applicant complained.

An official in the passport wing of the MEA pleaded helplessness. "The previous initiative to make the Tatkal procedure easier was never called off officially, which is why the information on the website hasn't been altered either."

The official said Internet-verifiable identity documents would remove any doubt passport officials might have about a Tatkal application.

Additional reporting by A.S.R.P. Mukesh