In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, May 16, 2015

7968 - Modi’s first year in office - Tavleen Singh -Indian Express


By Tavleen Singh, Indian Express,
May 10, 2015



 So we approach the end of Narendra Modi’s first year as prime minister and us political pundit types are obliged to analyse and comment.

By next week there will be a surfeit of commentary and analysis, so by contributing my two bits a week early, I am hoping to beat the glut. If everyone has the same idea, bad luck for you and for me.

In recent days many so-called ‘insiders’ have unleashed a fusillade of criticism of the Modi government. One or two telephoned me to explain why they hate Modi and I found that they said the same things to me as they had a year ago. They started speaking this way immediately after failing to become ministers or at least Rajya Sabha MPs. This disappointment turned into bile and venom and the Prime Minister has done well not to respond to their criticism. He must though respond publicly to real criticism than he has so far done. In the past year he has isolated himself from journalists, businessmen, well-wishers and his constituents in Benares. And this has allowed a barricade of officials, petty and mighty, to rise up around him. This is not good.

Among the worst legacies of Nehruvian socialism was that immense power was put in the hands of officials. They ran major public sector corporations, big banks, universities, literary and music academies, government hospitals and even service industries like hotels and airlines. They switched from one area of expertise to another without having expertise in anything. This often made them arrogant and delusional. Long is the list of foreign investors who came with the hope of investing in India but ran away because of the red tape that officials used to tie them in knots.

The Prime Minister has failed to bring these officials under control. And, so while he talks of making India the best country in the world for business, they slyly continue to impose horrendous taxes and invent stupid new rules. Of these possibly the stupidest is the plan to ask Indian taxpayers to give details of foreign travels when they file income tax returns.

The problem with putting a rule like this in place is that it gives vast powers of harassment in the hands of petty officials who are usually more corrupt than the ‘burra sahibs’. Of these the most corrupt are those who work in the tax department, so to give them extra power to seek out black money is a very bad idea. If the Prime Minister is surprised that investment in India, both foreign and Indian, has not revived, he should not be.

It is not just taxpayers who are victims of petty officialdom. The worst victims are India’s poorest citizens. The street people I work with in Mumbai report that police harassment has increased hugely in the past year and because of this their hopes of ‘achhe din’ have begun to die. Policemen routinely arrest their children on false charges of begging and vagrancy and routinely tell them to ‘go back to the jungle’. They do not know where this jungle is since none of them have known a home other than the streets of Mumbai.

What should worry the Prime Minister even more are tales from Benares that I recently heard from people who voted for Modi because they believed he would transform their beloved city. They told me they were very worried about a Benares redevelopment plan that involves the demolition of ancient and wonderful old buildings and temples in the perimeter of the Vishwanath Mandir. If this is true, then it is madness. Even if the Prime Minister wants to keep a safe distance from us hacks, he would do well to give more access to his constituents. This will not be easy because of the barricade of officials, mighty and petty, that now stands in the way.

On a personal level I believe that the Prime Minister’s biggest failure in this past year has been his inability to give us at least a hint of new policies in education and healthcare. Massive changes are needed to rectify the harm done over decades because Nehruvian socialist rulers did not even attempt to decolonise mass education. Then there are public health services so abysmal that even the poorest Indians prefer private doctors. Could he not at least have insisted that elected representatives and officials use only public services? Just this would have made such a difference because only when the children of officials use government schools will they improve and only when officials are forced to use government hospitals will they provide real heath services.


The optimism that Modi’s victory created last summer at this time is still there but unless investment and jobs revive, visibly and soon the optimism could dissipate faster than a Delhi dust storm.