In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, August 5, 2017

11717 - Food security: Aadhaar eliminating corruption a myth - Governance Now

There is a need to create a coordinating mechanism among various departments involved in the implementation of NFSA in a state


Pradeep Baisakh | August 3, 2017 | New Delhi

(Illustration: Ashish Asthana)

In April this year, activists dealing with food security wanted to know from people in Katar village in Rajasthan’s Bhilwara district whether the information uploaded on a website where PDS has been linked to Aadhaar was correct.
As the online information was displayed in a big screen in the village, people were surprised to see their actual entitlements. 

One villager said, “Hey this is my name, but I am not getting my monthly ration that is mentioned here. The dealer is giving me ration in alternative months. How is it possible? My entitlement is linked to Aadhaar!” Other villagers also reacted similarly. 

Further enquiry revealed that the dealer was manipulating the system. Though he gives the wheat in alternative month, kerosene is given on a monthly basis to the ration cardholders. While taking the fingerprint for kerosene every month in the POS (Point of Sale) machine, he also takes the same for the wheat without the knowledge of the card holder! 

He may take the fingerprint in the machine as many times as he wants just by saying that the impression could not be read. When the embezzlement was exposed, the villagers demanded their quota of wheat back, forcing two dealers to distribute seven truck-loads of wheat to the people.

The lesson: the system with Aadhaar in place is manipulable. 

The dealers were not giving any receipt against the distributed entitlements. They also did not mention the amount in the ration card and sign it. And people believed that Aadhaar prevents their entitlement from being siphoned off.

In a workshop organized by the Right to Food campaign in Delhi in July last week, social workers from various states discussed the performance of the scheme on the ground. A major concern was of course the mandatory use of Aadhaar in many states. There are instances where an old person having Aadhaar is not getting his quota of rice and wheat, as his fingerprints just do not match. 

“Under the Aadhaar system, the old, the migrants and the children are more likely to be excluded andall of them belong to the most vulnerable groups,” says Shankar Singh of Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS), Rajasthan.

Aadhaar is not much of an issue in Bihar or in West Bengal. But the Bihar government is roping in private companies to do the social audit, which will defeat the very purpose of audit. Ideally the villagers themselves should do the social audits, shared a social worker from Bihar. 
The labourers of the tea gardens in West Bengal, where malnutrition is high, are receiving bad quality flour in place of wheat. In Uttar Pradesh, all the PDS cards had photograph of former chief minister on it. Now the photo of the new chief minister Yogi Adityanath is there. It has not affected people getting their entitlements.

In a series of visits made by the volunteers of right to food campaign to the ration shops in Delhi, it was found that nearly 60 percent shops are closed and information on the display board about the beneficiary details was not updated.

In Jharkhand, in some cases the fingerprint is taken for both sugar and wheat, but only wheat is given. In Gujarat, there is visible lack of awareness among the members of the village level vigilance committee about their role. Aadhaar is mandatory in Gujarat.

A set of recommendations was given by the campaign. There is an issue with the internal grievance redressal mechanism, which needs to be sorted out. In most cases, the comprehensive rule under NFSA has not been formulated. There is need of creating a coordinating mechanism among various departments involved in the implementation of NFSA in a state.