In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, November 5, 2017

12269 - We are not Fully Armoured to Secure Aadhaar Data - New Indian Express

By Yatish yadav  |   Published: 29th October 2017 04:00 AM  |  
Last Updated: 28th October 2017 10:32 PM  |   A+A A-   |  


Yatish yadav Deputy Editor, New Indian Express 

Ameising Luikham, Secretary in the Ministry of Minority Affairs, raised a pertinent question during a meeting of top bureaucrats at the committee room of Cabinet Secretariat on May 18. He wanted to know whether the government had any specific recommendation as far as the compliance of Aadhaar Act 2016 is concerned. Many schemes of the Ministry are implemented through private institutions, but they lack protocols for ensuring secure storage of Aadhaar information with proper safeguards. 

Although there is nothing new about apprehensions raised by Luikham, it certainly draws attention since he is one of the government’s top officers, who are actually responsible for drafting and implementing the public policies on the ground. 
The security issue has been debated within and outside the government since the 12-digit unique number came into existence in 2010. And, this has been troubling many despite the government’s repeated assurance that Aadhaar data is safe, and linking it with various schemes will help in delivery of the essential services a little more efficiently. Has this security concern been effectively addressed by the government? I don’t think so.

No government can claim its system is unbreakable. Americans thought they had the most sophisticated virtual wall in the world. The wishful thinking was demolished by the Chinese and many Eastern Europe-based state and non-state actors. We are standing on the threshold of a digital war. It is becoming harder to monitor the activities of cyber terrorist groups that are bent on harming the national security. The government needs to remember as data storage grows, so will its vulnerability.
There is cause for concern because the government is putting all its eggs in one basket.  Starting from kitchen to the bank, whatever is essential for people to live and survive, now hinges upon the magical number and to the connected biometric profile. A top officer of the Agriculture Ministry in that meeting pointed out that if Aadhaar information of farmers could be linked with land records, Soil Health Cards and supply of fertilisers, it would enable calibrated delivery of requisite inputs. He is right. Data is great enabler. But, only when it is secure in your hand. If the volume of data grows together with the security mechanism, there is no fear. But, if data grows alone and is linked at various points without secured architecture, then there is fear, then something can go horribly wrong.
This issue was raised by a group of petitioners, who had moved the Supreme Court to contest the government’s action. Petitioners had argued that it was better to warn the government beforehand that it needs to keep the balance in digital governance. The government proposal, that linking Aadhaar is mandatory to avail the benefits of its schemes, has witnessed many deadlines. The government is open to extend it to March 31, 2018. In the meantime, the five-judge bench of the Supreme Court is to hear the petitioners and the government on the validity of Aadhaar.

Petitioners have argued that Section 8(2)(b) of the Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services Act, 2016, is categorical that an agency requesting authentication ensures that the identity information of an individual is only used for submission to the Central Identities Data Repository of 12-digit biometric Unique Identification numbers for authentication and it does not authorise anyone to hold on to the number. In this context, the accountability of public and private institutions to safeguard the data is paramount. Can they deliver?

Amarjeet Sinha, Rural Development Secretary, had recently urged that clear protocols from the National Informatics Centre (NIC) and Unique Identification Authority of India is required to ensure security of data, as mandated by the Aadhaar Act. Sinha had suggested that trainings and workshops must be organised for NIC officers on safeguards, and protocols be followed for managing Aadhaar-related data. This shows we are not battle-ready. Not only do we lack adequate armour, but in certain areas the protective mechanism is hollow, empty.

Foes are many. From non-state actors operating in the dark web world, to the foreign agencies operative in cloak looking for the priceless data. And we must be perfectly ready to protect cyber attacks targeting Aadhaar, otherwise we will miss the ultimate objective and this efficient welfare drive might result in a security nightmare.


yatish@newindianexpress.com