In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, November 24, 2017

12424 - Resolve bottlenecks, use Aadhaar authentication sparingly - TNN

November 23, 2017, 11:41 AM IST Jiby J Kattakayam in Jibber Jabber | India | TOI

On a day when citizens were delighted at the Airports Authority of India promising seamless air travel allowing domestic flyers who link their tickets to their Aadhaar number to whiz through airports, the Union tourism minister got an earful from a distressed passenger whose flight out of Imphal was delayed by VVIP movement. This is the irony of our development models. We are riding on broadband coverage and Aadhaar penetration to offer peripheral technological solutions but core service delivery continues to be patchy.

So Aadhaar will help a flyer zip past the CISF security personnel at airport entrance. Don’t forget that more lines to scan baggage, check-in, clear security checks, and boarding await the flyer. But what happens if your biometric is not recognised and you carry no other identification believing that Aadhaar is a failsafe technology. Or worse, what if networks are down as it happens infrequently?

I am not one of the anti-Aadhaar activists. I am only against its widespread use for every conceivable purpose. I am not opposed to Aadhaar being used to link PAN cards, property registration, and disbursal of subsidies and scholarship. But Aadhaar to access an ambulance, get admission to a hospital or school, registering deaths, are perfect examples of administrators letting their Aadhaar fantasies run wild. It is another matter whether all the Aadhar tech wizardry is of any purpose if infrastructure is non- existent and services patchy.

What Union minister Alphons Kannanthanam faced was the unhappiness of a middle class citizen’s dismay at physical infrastructure not keeping pace with internet technologies that make our lives easier. The protests in Bengaluru and Mumbai on potholes, the alarm in Delhi over air quality, the anti-corruption protests of 2011-12 are all manifestations of middle class angst over India’s continued inability to offer world class services. Despite reports of massive Aadhaar authentication failures in PDS systems it is a miracle we are not seeing food riots. The poor in this country have been so crushed that their voices are being scarcely heard in the big cities.

It is only natural that people who book air tickets and make payments online and are delivered a bouquet of goods and services at the doorstep — all things that consumed hours of one’s time in earlier decades — will raise their voice when one arm of the service fails to buck up. Air travel may fair better than Indian Railways in punctuality and service quality but the expectations are that much higher and continually increasing. The inability to keep pace with expectations has led to the elite and rich abandoning government schools and hospitals. Now even famous public universities and colleges like Delhi University and Jawaharlal Nehru University are losing out to newer private ones like Ashoka and Shiv Nadar.

But we also have shining examples of professionalism in the public sector like Delhi Metro and ISRO. VIP movement, hartals, large political rallies, are all disrupting ordinary lives in cities, small towns and villages. It is normal to associate these inconveniences with the practice of democracy in our country. A recent survey indicated a massive fascination with martial rule in India. The assumption is that the military is a disciplined, efficient and incorruptible organization. We only need to look at neighbouring Pakistan or Bangladesh during the Gen Ershad era to understand how misplaced these perceptions are. There is no alternative to liberal democracy in the foreseeable future but our politicians will have to be more receptive to public grievances and rectify problems in service delivery.


DISCLAIMER : Views expressed above are the author's own.