In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, November 2, 2017

12196 - Want to Ditch Social Security Numbers? Try Blockchain - Bloomberg


Other countries have found safer alternatives to the nine-digit number that dominates identity in the U.S.
By Suzanne Woolley
10 October 2017 2:54:20 AM AEDT

In the wake of the huge Equifax data breach, which compromised the personal information of 145.5 million U.S. consumers, the Trump administration asked federal departments and agencies to do something bold: Come up with a new identity system that does not rely on overexposed and octogenarian Social Security numbers.

Other countries already enjoy just this kind of society in which there’s no unique nine-digit number that holds the key to anyone’s economic identity. The problem might not be imagining a world without Social Security numbers but surveying other systems to pick, and perhaps adapt, the best ones. “The U.S. doesn’t have to totally reinvent the wheel here,” said Daniel Castro, director of the Center for Data Innovation, a think tank.

Rob Joyce, special assistant to the president and White House cybersecurity coordinator, suggested at a recent conference in Washington that an improved system might involve technologies such as a “modern cryptographic identifier.” And in fact other countries already embrace blockchain and biometrics as backbones for government and private-sector systems. Often these tools are used in tandem with other authentication techniques to verify a citizen’s identity, provide easy access to services, and keep a permanent record of interactions. Whether these technologies now gaining momentum will prove enough protection against future cyberattacks will be the story to watch over the next few years.

Here are some of the ways governments outside the U.S. have set up modern identity systems that allow citizens to share and protect their personal information. 

Trusting the Blockchain With Identities
“One of the world’s most developed digital societies” is how Estonia describes itself on its e-estonia.com website. After a nationwide cyberattack in 2007, the government began moving toward a blockchain-based system developed by an Estonian company to secure and protect its data and systems. Blockchain is software that supports a sort of public ledger, albeit an encrypted one, that stores data that cannot be erased or rewritten without leaving a record of the previous data.

Estonia’s eHealth Authority is working on putting its citizens’ medical records on blockchain. Dubai, another early government adopter of blockchain technology, plans to do the same with medical records and have all government documents on the blockchain by 2020. 


An Estonian press officer using the country’s mobile identification in Tallinn, Estonia. Photographer: Fabian Weiss/The New York Times via Redux
Estonian ID cards, which have an electronic chip, can be used to vote, bank online, get a prescription, file taxes, apply for state benefits, and much more. The cards require two PIN codes: the first is to authenticate an identity; the second acts as a digital signature. When the person is linked with whatever resource they’re using, the data are preserved on the blockchain. 
Estonia’s government database system is based on a secure data exchange called X-Road, and citizens use their e-IDs to access services. It’s a sort of peer-to-peer encrypted information exchange between independent computer systems. The X-Road website notes that the Estonian-developed system is being used in Finland, Azerbaijan, Namibia, and Faroe Islands. Japan consulted with Estonia in launching its MyNumber card, its first national digital ID program. 
Voice Biometrics Turn Identity Into Sound
The Australian Taxation Office uses voice-based biometric authentication for its call center and mobile app. Rather than provide a date of birth or a password when calling about your taxes, citizens can create a voiceprint and then identify themselves by saying, “In Australia my voice identifies me.” About 3 million taxpayers have done that.

The technology was developed by Nuance, a Burlington, Mass., company. Nuance also has deals with Australia’s Department of Human Services and Department of Immigration and Border Protection. Australia’s intent, though it’s not quite there yet, “is to ensure that citizens have a unique identifier that they can use across all government agencies,” says Brett Beranek, director of product strategy for voice biometrics at Nuance. Beranek says its algorithms can measure more than 1,000 voice characteristics to verify an identity.

The Australian government is working to create a comprehensive digital identity system. The website for its Digital Transformation Agency’s GovPass project says that “users will be able to prove themselves by having an accredited organization vouch for them, such as a government agency, or in the future, even their own bank.” The project involves building new technology that will function as a middleman between a government department and an organization or other verifier of a person’s identity. An “electronic tick of approval” from an accredited verifier will open up access to government online services.

Starting in January, meanwhile, taxpayers in the United Kingdom using the mobile app of tax authority HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) have been able to enroll to use voice identity to get speedier service from the tax agency. 
Fingerprint and Iris Scans Turn Bodies Into Identities
Bloomberg Business
Get the best of Bloomberg delivered to your inbox daily



India’s identity biometrics program is called Aadhaar, which means “foundation” in Hindi. Citizens can enroll to get a 12-digit Aadhaar number, which is issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India. You increasingly need the number to perform transactions, such as opening a bank account, or get services, so citizens are under real pressure to enroll. That number is linked to a central database containing biometric information, including an iris and fingerprint scan, demographic information, and a photograph. India’s government has mandated that people filing their electronic income tax return must link their 10-character permanent account number, which is needed for many financial transactions, to their Aadhaar number. 

A migrant farm worker scans her fingerprints to register to receive a national identity card and number in New Delhi, India. Photographer: Ruth Fremson/The New York Times via Redux
Such countries as Tanzania, Afghanistan, and Bangladesh have gone to India to learn more about Aadhaar. Paul Romer, chief economist at the World Bank, has called it “the most sophisticated system” he’s seen. The World Bank’s World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends noted that “a digital identification system such as India’s Aadhaar, by overcoming complex information problems, helps willing governments to promote the inclusion of disadvantaged groups.” 
Privacy advocates have raised concerns about the program, which now has biometric data on more than 1 billion people in its database. A May report by India’s Centre for Internet & Society noted that it had found “public disclosures by four government portals of Aadhaar numbers” and other personal data, but had not found that the central biometric database had been breached.

In August, responding to legal challenges to the biometric program, India’s top court ruled that citizens have a fundamental right to privacy. That has been described as a potential setback in the government’s plan to link more parts of citizen lives, such as their mobile phone numbers and driver’s licenses, to their Aadhaar number.