In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, November 3, 2017

12238 - Do not force us to do Aadhar seeding, it is against spirit of democracy: Largest bank officers’ body - Indian Express

Do not force us to do Aadhar seeding, it is against spirit of democracy: Largest bank officers’ body

In the implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, public sector banks and regional rural banks have opened 29.13 crore accounts as against 96 lakh accounts by the private banks.


Written by Arun Janardhanan | Chennai | Updated: October 24, 2017 1:32 pm

Earlier in the day, Reserve Bank of India said linkage of biometric identity number Aadhaar with bank accounts is mandatory.

RELATED NEWS
  • The All India Bank Officers Confederation (AIBOC), the largest body representing over 3,25,000 officers, opposed the Centre’s move making Aadhaar mandatory and forcing bank officers to do Aadhar seeding. When the matter is subjudice in the Supreme Court, “the urgency of the government in its implementation is uncalled for and against the true spirit of democracy,” AIBOC said in a statement.
The body said banks are already reeling under acute shortage of staff and the employees and officers are overburdened. In the implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, public sector banks and regional rural banks have opened 29.13 crore accounts as against 96 lakh accounts by the private banks. In Mudra loans, the former has disbursed Rs 79,687 crores against the latter’s Rs 38,772 crores. More than Rs 62.58 lakh Mudra loans have been processed by the public sector and regional rural banks. Bhim (an initiative to make India cashless), Jeevan Jyothi (a government-backed life insurance scheme), Jyoti Bima, Suraksha Bima (a government-backed accident insurance scheme) and Sovereign Gold Bond are some of the other schemes public sector banks have been made to use their resources without any return, the body said.

The AIBOC has now opposed the Centre’s move following a direction to banks to complete Aadhaar seeding and also open Aadhaar enrolment centres in its branches. “It is understood that government has instructed the banks to ask its staff and officers to work on holidays to complete the task. The responsibility for any mistake will be on the officer who authorises and he or she is not trained for the same. Moreover, SC has given an interim order saying that Aadhaar should not be made mandatory. The banks should not be taken to task when final judgement comes in the light of the Right to Privacy judgment. At a time when the resources of the public sector banks are under severe strain and under closer public scrutiny, employing their resources on Aadhaar seeding will further constrain Public Sector Banks in their efforts of recovery of Non-performing Assets (NPAs), which eventually will further deteriorate the health of the banks besides attracting negative opinion among the public,” the statement said, adding that Banks have not been paid any reimbursement for these expenses. “The officers and staff have also not been paid compensation for working on holidays and for late sitting.”

On August 11, 2015, the SC passed an interim order stating that the Aadhaar card was to be used only for the PDS scheme and for the LPG distribution scheme, a clear mandate to not to be used by the government for any other services. “This was later echoed by a constitution bench of the Supreme Court,” said the statement.

The AIBOC statement added that bank customers are also in “panic mode as they are being bombarded by ominous messages, emails and calls from banks about the dire consequences they could face if they fail to link their Aadhaar number to their bank accounts before the December 31 deadline. Banks have gone into an overdrive to get their account holders to furnish the Aadhaar details – and desperate to head off a situation where their branches might end up being swamped by queues and frantic customers as the deadline nears,” AIBOC said. “Even small account holders are not left and there is a panic amongst the poor population holding basic savings accounts to meet their day to day needs,” said the statement.

The bank officers’ body reminded that the government and the SC have contradicting stands in the issue. “In its fight against tax evasion, the Centre has made it mandatory to quote the Aadhaar number for opening bank accounts and also made Aadhaar compulsory for 135 schemes (of 35 ministries) including free cooking gas (LPG) to poor women, kerosene and fertiliser subsidy, targeted public distribution system (PDS) and MGNREGA. However, the Supreme Court has restricted usage of Aadhaar to six schemes where the government provides benefits or subsidy to individuals,” the statement said.


For all the latest India News, download Indian Express App