In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, March 19, 2018

12994 - Right to Food being violated - News Click

https://www.newsclick.in/right-food-being-violated-worsened-aadhaar-say-people-public-hearing


Families continue being denied ration and social security pension, due to lack of Aadhaar or failure of biometric authentication.

Newsclick Report 15 Mar 2018


People from 14 states testified to the rampant violations of the Right to Food at a national public hearing on 15 March organised by the Right to Food Campaign at the Gandhi Peace Foundation in Delhi.

The testimonies spoke of the denials of entitlements — to food, social security pensions and even work — and were heard by a panel consisting of activists, journalists, lawyers, legislators, scholars and trade union leaders.

Once again, the people suffering these violations confirmed that the mandatory linking of Aadhaar to welfare schemes had caused large-scale exclusions and continued to cause starvation deaths.

Several families have been denied a ration card — primarily because of lacking Aadhaar — despite meeting the criteria for inclusion in the Public Distribution System under the National Food Security Act (NFSA) 2013.

Debashish, a sarpanch from Koraput in Odisha, said that out of the 1,393 households in his Gram Panchayat, 175 households still did not have a ration card, even though they had applied more than a year ago.

Due to the mandatory requirement of Aadhaar, said Debashish, there were disruptions even in the payment of cash under the Mamta Yojana, the state-funded maternity entitlement scheme.
The activists associated with the Right to Food Campaign also talked about the various cases of starvation deaths caused due to the denial of services either because of lacking Aadhaar or because of problems in the biometric authentication.

Taramani Sahu from Simdega in Jharkhand spoke of the starvation death of 11-year-old Santoshi, after her family’s ration card was cancelled in the absence of Aadhaar seeding.
Vishwanath from Jharkhand talked about the starvation death of Budhni Soren, a tribal woman from Giridih, in January 2018.
Narsimha from Karnataka presented details of the hunger deaths of three brothers in Gokarna in the state, after their ration was discontinued for want of Aadhaar.

Rama, a woman from Delhi, said even though the Delhi government had introduced equipment for iris scanning of ration card-holders, she was still unable to authenticate her identity and was excluded from the PDS.

Many people in vulnerable social and economic positions testified to not receiving social security pension. Gulshan Khatoun from Noida said he had three sons with disability, but none of them received pension. Similarly, Maida Khatoon, a widow from Noida, does not get pension.

Rajiv Gowda, a Rajya Sabha member from Karnataka, was present at the hearing and said that although his party (the Congress) had initially brought Aadhaar, the intention was never to use the Unique Identification system as a tool for exclusion.


Many people from the different states talked about the hardships they were facing due to large-scale unemployment.