In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, March 31, 2018

13149 - Big Brother's laughing - Telegraph India


Big Brother's laughing

Life in an Aadhaar application centre



'Sir, it's not working. We can't file your returns without an Aadhaar card number or at least the application number.' The diligent man who works for my CA is sounding stressed - I'm guessing I'm not the only client who needs the situation explained.

Dark words flit through my mind - Kafkaesque, Catch-22, back-door fascism, Big Brotherism crossed with devious desi jugaad, and so on.

Even as the Supreme Court mulls over the issues around the Aadhaar card, whether a citizen is obliged to get one, and if so to what degree must the card be linked to an individual's various information clusters, Arun Jaitley's Income-Tax Kommandantur has taken its own, unilateral step: if you don't have an Aadhaar card or application number the IT website's software will just not allow you to upload your tax returns.

If you don't file your taxes you will be in breach of the law and liable for fines.

Whatever the honourable Supreme Court's decision, this is Indian Bureaucracy meri jaan, so good luck arguing later that you shouldn't be penalized for not acceding to an as yet unlawful demand. Bingo, Jai Shri Aachhe Din, Sabki Marammat, Sabka Vinash.

I have several issues with handing over my personal data and biometrics to the chaotic miasma of a technically inept, easy-to-hack, easy-to-purchase bureaucratic machinery of the Indian State. I would have these objections even if the government in power was run by the most honest and benign people imaginable; given that the opposite is the case, that we are ruled by a tiny, cynical cabal of regressive RSS puppets, my objections multiply a thousand times.

With one click of some mouse, a person could be digitally obliterated, disabled like an unplugged home appliance, no matter whether the mouse is clicked accidentally, because of monetary corruption, or by some unter-sanghchalak's targeted chalaki.

Besides the practical misgivings there is also the matter of principle - how much should the government and State know about an individual in a democracy? Why should anyone but the income-tax authorities know how much I have in my bank account? Why should anyone but a security agency with a legally acquired warrant know my phone number or what I'm doing on my phone?

Why should anyone without checks or balances be able to map my past and present movements, or potentially sell that information for profit?

'Naa sir, hobey na. Aapni application-ta just koriye nin (No, sir, it won't work, please just do the application.)'

I've tried to explore a way around the trap for about two weeks and now my CA's man is sounding desperate; on the phone I can hear his hair turning grey. I weigh the pros and cons of applying for an A-card. The money in the bank isn't enough to interest anyone; my political views are openly displayed in print every week; my activity on the phone is unremarkable (okay, I regret clicking on that YouTube link, the one of Lionel Messi's 78 nutmeggings of top flight goal-keepers, not good optics for a vociferous supporter of Brazil like myself, but what to do?); my health data are, happily, still boring; ergo, there is nothing, ostensibly, to steal or manipulate.

On the other hand, when the Supreme Court finishes with its deliberations, this government and its tame bureaucrats are bound to subvert both the letter and the spirit of any adverse judgment; so having already jumped into the pit might make things easier in the long run. So why not just get it done and over with?

I locate a bank near my house that's processing A-card applications and I present myself at 10 am sharp. The guard outside starts laughing, almost falling down the steps to the entrance. He points to the long queue that I thought was for the ATM. 'Twenty people a day, dada, and we are done for today!'

'Okay, where does one get the form for tomorrow then?' I ask briskly. The man laughs even louder and waves the sheaf of filled forms in his hand. 'We are also done for tomorrow and day after. Come the next day by 8 am and you might have a chance.' Two days later, I get there by 7.30 am, form all filled, documents ready, and manage to sneak in just under the wire. I'm number 18 and feeling good about it. For the next two hours, people come, circle around sniffing for a gap in the queue, and then leave.

School students stand in line doing their homework; girlfriends give real-time updates to boyfriends; mothers open tiffins for their small ones; two people come to check for wheelchair access and we all laugh at them - workers have begun to dig open the paving at two ends of the sidewalk in front of the bank; the nice blue and white railings block access to the road in front; forget about wheelchairs, the bank is being sealed off from any ingress whatsoever.

When I message a friend in Delhi to tell her what I'm doing, she replies to say that somebody she knows had to take their dying 94-year-old mother to get her Aadhaar made. 'Otherwise you'll have a problem getting the death certificate,' her children had been warned.

At 10.15, the guard tells us the Aadhaar link is down and we'll have to wait. Just before noon, our forms are taken in exchange of tokens and we are told to come back the next day. I wonder about the death certificates of the people who are putting us through this. I go back for the next three days but the link stays down, not just in this bank but in the whole area. 'This is deliberate,' says one gent, grimly, 'this is a punishment for not getting it done earlier, and now they will sabotage the link and collect mass fines, you just watch!'

As the March-end deadline ticks closer, I try and find other centres. Many have been shut down. The links keep dropping in others. Finally, I hit jackpot. Another bank nearby has opened up a station. I rush there, jumping through deadly traffic, ready to be disappointed. No, it's true, they are processing applications, 'yes, the link is working, please fill out a form and wait'. After a small fist pump, I find a chair and settle down. I've brought my stuff with me and I take them out: a book, a notebook, pens, pencils, three untouched Sudoku puzzles (Diabolical), a bottle of water. I wish I'd thought of bringing a sandwich as well, but never mind, at least the bank has air-conditioning.

For the next three hours, I watch the strange ritual being repeated. The officer sits at one terminal, the victim at an adjacent screen. First, the 3-D glasses; 'Chokh khola raakhben!' Don't blink! Then the four-finger piano exercise, right hand, then left hand. Then the two thumbs on the fighter plane gun-buttons, rat-a-tat-tat! Bullseye, that's a kill!

Congratulations, you've just shot your privacy to smithereens! Please check if all your details are correct, correcting them later will be difficult.

At one point there is great fun - a young mother in a burqa is trying to get her cute two-year-old to do the needful and the kid just loves the game, first the funny goggles, which he peeks into and pushes away, again and again, then the finger-press game which lasts a long time because the scanner doesn't register his delicate prints, then ammi nearly breaks his thumbs because he's being uncooperative and he howls in rage. Then huge laughter as he's carried away by the exasperated parent, leaving bank staff smiling all around. 'This happens,' explains the bank officer doing the scanning, 'if you're very small or over, say, fifty-five, the prints don't register easily.'

When my turn comes the same thing happens, either because my whorls are over fifty-five or my digits have more self-respect than me. I verify my details and depart, leaving behind two crumpled Sudokus that have stumped me at the last moment. When I send my CA a close-up photo of the application number, his man calls me back. 'Sir, please send a photo of the whole document, they also need the exact time of the application.'