In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Tuesday, March 27, 2018

13120 - Narendra Modi’s employment woes: How Aadhaar-based headcount can help - Financial Express


In order to ensure that the unemployed are not forced to beg or take up crime and other unsocial activities, the US had, as early as in 1935, passed the Social Security Act, under which the Unemployment Insurance programme was set up and Social Security numbers issued to each individual.
By: RC Acharya | Published: March 26, 2018 4:51 AM

The recent hold up of ‘Locals’, the economic lifeline of Mumbai, reportedly by some students, has once again highlighted the urgent need for job creation, a priority mission in which the government has not been able to make much headway so far. (PTI)

The recent hold up of ‘Locals’, the economic lifeline of Mumbai, reportedly by some students, has once again highlighted the urgent need for job creation, a priority mission in which the government has not been able to make much headway so far.
Unemployed youth are virtual time bombs, and usually explode in the form of riots or civil disturbance, sometimes organised by groups with a political agenda. They are also easy target for criminal organisations who find in them persons willing to do anything for cash, including murder. In order to ensure that the unemployed are not forced to beg or take up crime and other unsocial activities, the US had, as early as in 1935, passed the Social Security Act, under which the Unemployment Insurance programme was set up and Social Security numbers issued to each individual.
Two decades earlier, in 1915, the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) had started carrying out Current Employment Statistics surveys, which provided information about the state of the economy. It was envisioned as an employment index for industries such as hosiery, boots and shoes, cotton goods and cotton finishing, etc. BLS carries out a Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages, which collates both the population list and the primary source of employment data, and manages to cover about 97% of the population. The primary statistics derived from this survey are monthly estimates of employment, hours, and earnings for the entire nation, states and major metropolitan areas. Preliminary National Estimates for a given month are typically released on the third Friday after the conclusion of the reference period. This includes data derived from a separate survey of households and the Current Population Survey.
The methodology for collecting such a voluminous information is, in itself, interesting. New samples are solicited by computer-assisted telephone interviewing (CATI). After the initial period of five months, many sample units are transferred to one of less costly reporting methods that are self-initiated by the respondent. In order to encourage businesses to voluntarily report, it offers them a choice of reporting modes to suit their individual preference and elicit maximum response. The Current Employment Statistics is based on a survey of 147,000 businesses and government agencies representing 634,000 work sites throughout the US. Each month, BLS collects data on employment, payroll and paid hours from a sample of establishments.
Reportedly, the US economy gained 148,000 jobs in December 2017, against 150,000 new jobs needed each month to keep expanding. Industries that gained jobs were about 30,000 in construction, 29,200 in healthcare, in spite of uncertainty over Donald Trump’s healthcare plan. Leisure and hospitality added 29,000 jobs, while manufacturing gained 21,000 as a weak dollar helped exports. Temporary help services gained 7,000 jobs, while information and financial services added 7,000 and 6,000 jobs, respectively.
In India, perhaps the only reliable source of statistics on unemployment data is the annual Economic Survey, which is based on data from labour ministry, with no sector-wise details of the three major sectors, i.e. agriculture (46% of the workforce), manufacturing (22%) and services (32%). A headcount based on Aadhaar could perhaps help clearly identify those in the labour force who are gainfully employed and who are jobless, at least in urban areas where most are now computer literate and could log into a government portal specifically designed for this.

Despite Narendra Modi’s promise at a rally in 2013 in Agra to create a crore new jobs every year, and various government initiatives such as Make-in-India, Skill India and Start-up India, the progress in this vital sphere has been rather tardy. In fact, the unemployment rate of 4.9% in 2013-14 rose to 5% in 2015-16. Demonetisation and the I-T Department’s war against black money seem to have dampened the enthusiasm of even the genuine investors and PM Modi has to pull out all the stops in order to get the economy going with millions of new jobs created in time for his foray into the elections of 2019.