In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, April 1, 2018

13165 - What’s your Aadhaar? - Indian Express

By Ramzauva Chhakchhuak  |  Express News Service  |   Published: 31st March 2018 05:14 AM  |  

BENGALURU: Despite the matter of linking the Aadhaar to one's bank account and mobile connection being in the court for a while now, companies who offer such services insist on the same in clear violation of the laws. 

The Supreme Court judgment on March 13, extending the dates for linking such services indefinitely,  has come as a shot in the arm for those who have been opposing the move right from the beginning.

Many are not taking things lying down and are taking a stand whether in their individual capacity or as part of groups.

Take the case of Eliot Lobo, a city-based freelance writer who went to meet the relationship manager of his bank, a day prior to the March 13 ruling to weigh his options in case Aadhaar was made mandatory to avail such services. So far, Eliot has refused to get an Aadhaar identity for himself. Linking his bank account and mobile connection to Aadhaar was always out of the question for him, he says. 

Had the SC judgment  not been in favour of people like him, Eliot says, "I was considering the possibility of taking out all my money from the bank." He says he was receiving emails from his bank on a daily basis asking him to link his account to Aadhaar. Eliot has an account with a private bank in Pune, which he has not yet moved to Bengaluru yet.



"I asked the manager what the withdrawal restrictions were. He told me that I could move my money through cheques in around two instalments. He understood the predicament of customers like me. In fact, he himself told me that he had not linked his mobile phone to Aadhaar yet," he adds. However, thanks to the judgment, Eliot has put off plans to close his account for the time being.
   
No to ‘arm twisting’
Another Bengaluru resident, C R Sridhar is a lawyer by profession, who has also been badgered by firms to link his bank account to his Aadhaar. He thinks it's "crude arm twisting" on the part of banks and telecom operators to force customers into something that has not been fully cleared by the courts. On the morning of the day the SC gave its judgment on the matter, Sridhar immediately visited his bank in R T Nagar. "I had to be the one to tell the bank the deadline had been extended. They were sending a lot of messages on my phone and frankly, I was fed up.

I went to a senior manager and told him that I was filing a contempt of court proceedings if they did not stop all this," says Sridhar. The bank finally backed off. He further adds that banks should tell customers about the legality of the issue and not mindlessly hound them.

Others like Kiran Jonnalagadda, a techie and a well-known face in the city against the Aadhaar, joined hands with other like-minded individuals to start a website where citizens can write directly to their MPs, respective banks and mobile service providers in case of continuous ‘harassment’ to link Aadhaar. Called Speak For Me, the website was started four months ago and has become a huge hit.

Since it started till now, as many as 30,700 emails have been sent to MPs, 1,500 to banks, 1,600 to various mobile service providers. "I do not have an Aadhar card but like everyone else, I am also being constantly harassed to link it to various services. So instead of just me sending one email, now thousands are sending their concerns. We have also helped parliamentarians frame questions to ask in the hosue and it's bearing fruit," says Jonnalagadda. 


Stay up to date on all the latest Bengaluru news with The New Indian Express App. Download now