In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, April 2, 2018

13171 - You want my data? Take it! - The Hindu

APRIL 01, 2018 00:45 IST

In return, please stop giving me new tasks to do every six months

I really don’t want to wade into this brouhaha over data leaks, privacy, and how Facebook, Cambridge Analytica (CA), the NaMo app and UIDAI are allegedly running away with our hard-earned data. I’ve had enough of these well fed activisty types. They roam around in air-conditioned Ola cabs claiming to defend the privacy of the silent Indian masses when the whole world knows that the silent Indian masses will gladly exchange their privacy for a few kilos of rice.

When will these social media wranglers wake up and smell the cow dung? If they did, they would not only see the writing on the wall but also notice that the wall is 13 ft high, five ft wide, and built of reinforced thick skin.

Believe the good people
There are two entities in the world that never lie: the government and the corporates. The government, in this instance embodied in the UIDAI (hereafter just ‘Dai’), has told us a hundred times that Aadhaar data are secure. That means they are secure — end of discussion.

ALSO READ

Just because some jobless, attention-seeking Frenchman is doing Moulin Rouge on Twitter doesn’t mean we start doubting our own government. And what’s a Frenchman doing on Twitter anyway? If he was really French, he would be busy drinking wine, cooking soufflé, and having an extramarital affair in the Latin Quarter instead of bullying a poor country that can’t fight back.

Similarly, Mark Zuckerberg has told us a thousand times that he is a good guy. He was even hugged by Modiji. I refuse to believe that someone hugged by Modiji can do something evil. Simply put, the Aadhaar leaks and the Facebook-CA leaks are both complete non-issues.

Having said that, I must add that I am beginning to lose patience with these data-type fellows whose private lives are so impoverished that they spend all their time thinking up new ways to spy on people. Whether you are Dai, Zuckerberg, or just another influence-peddling stock market billionaire who’s befriended India’s politicians, bureaucrats, columnists, and think tanks, I have only one thing to say to you: if you want my data, just take it!

Take all of it, starting with my biometrics. Take my 10 fingerprints, all my toe prints, and my 32 dental imprints. Take my iris scans. Take samples of my hair, if you can find any, and harvest it for my DNA.

Once you’re done mopping up my biometrics, take all my demographic data, everything from my residence address, height, weight, BMI, date of birth, date of marriage, educational qualifications, employment history, credit history, location history, browsing history, shopping history, app history, medical history, and my lifetime’s history of the exact time I go for Swachh Bharat every morning.

In return, I ask for just one thing: stop being a pain you know where. I shall erase my humanity, crumple my personhood, and reduce myself to bits and bytes so you can hoard me in your omnivorous database. I shall link everything, including my own mother, to Aadhaar, if that’s what it takes to make India the greatest data farm in the history of the universe. But please stop giving me new tasks to do.

ALSO READ

Don’t tell me, after six months, that I have to link my thermometer to Aadhaar in order to buy Crocin for my fever. You want to keep doing new and exciting things with my data, do it at your expense, in your own time, without forcing people to stand in multiple queues multiple times every other month.

Obsession of a privileged elite
On the question of privacy, I’ve already said I am in complete agreement with the Government of India. Privacy is not a part of Indian culture. If Indians truly believed in privacy, would we need a Swachh Bharat Abhiyan? Privacy is the obsession of a privileged elite seduced by western decadence. As one of our esteemed ministers put it, “We have absolutely no problem getting body naked before the white man for U.S. visa. When your own government asks for your name and address there is a massive revolution saying it’s intrusion in privacy.”

Personally speaking, I will never get “body naked” before a white man, or any man, for that matter, just for a visa. But I do buy the larger point that when your government asks you for something, you shouldn’t, in principle, refuse. If it’s a matter of selling your baby or giving up your parking spot, I would understand someone making a fuss. But only an utterly selfish individual would refuse to surrender his privacy — which he got for free, by the way — when the government asks him to.


Anyway, let’s not forget that Dai and Zuckerberg are not asking for your money — just your data, which, if you think about it calmly, is nothing but the digital equivalent of faeces. It’s what you excrete every second you spend online.