In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, April 5, 2018

13191 - ‘Aadhaar could be used in totally unacceptable ways’ -


Ashish Chauhan | TNN | Updated: Apr 4, 2018, 09:58 IST

AHMEDABAD: The Aadhaar scheme, by which the government assigns citizens of India a 12-digit unique identity number, could be abused in totally unacceptable ways and should have safeguards, Noam Chomsky, the acclaimed American linguist and philosopher said in an interview to Swagat Baruah, a Gujarat National Law University (GNLU) student and editor of the varsity’s Catharsis magazine, a journal of political theory and philosophy.

“One could certainly see how such a system could be abused in totally unacceptable ways. There should be safeguards against that. You can see some kind of utility in such a system that would help citizens in their ordinary lives and you could also see dangers in the hands of an authoritarian system that would misuse it. If such a system is instituted and it should be done — it must be done — with democratic public support. It would have to be accompanied by safeguards and structures to prevent the kind of abuse easily imaginable,” said Chomsky, when asked for his thoughts on the Aadhaar system, which has been effected under the garb of constitutionality and democratic requirements. Apprising Chomsky about how the Aadhaar system has already led to abuses and is allegedly highly porous, Baruah said people have even lost their lives because they could not present their Aadhaar card when they needed treatment.

Chomsky then elaborated on the idea of social security and identification systems like the one in the US, and said, “Then comes the question of how it is used. Whether in an abusive way to control people or if it is used to facilitate people’s everyday lives, to improve things they can do, to make things easier for them and more convenient and so on. So those are the two questions that have to be raised. In the case of the Indian system, which I have not investigated, but by what you describe, it seems abusive in both respects, both in how it was instituted and how it is used.” 

On Left politics in India, Chomsky said, “The Left in India has been strong in Kerala for a long time and it shows that Kerala is different from other parts of India in terms of literacy and human rights and women’s rights and so on.” The state stands out, he said.

“The Left did have a powerful position in West Bengal and it sacrificed it for many reasons — corruption, and incompetence and so on. But I think it can be rebuilt. There have been times when progressive forces were crushed and they came back from the ashes. American history is full of it. Take the Labour movement in the United States. In the 1920s, it was virtually destroyed, a large part of it substantially by violence. Woodrow Wilson’s red scare was very violent. There was virtually nothing left of the labour movement. In the 1930s, it was reconstituted and rebuilt. It spearheaded the New Deal Welfare State measures which brought the United States more or less in line with European social democracy and persisted for the first decade of the post-war period, in the regulated capitalism period, the period of the greatest growth in American history and egalitarian growth, sometimes called the ‘golden age of capitalism’ and actually, state capitalism. Well, that was the zenith and then there has been a counter-attack and the unions are under serious attack and the labour movement has been and will be devastated by Supreme Court decisions that are coming in the future. But it can reconstitute again. Business classes are constantly engaged in class war dedicated relentlessly towards adapting to circumstances and the general public has to respond as well,” Chomsky said to Baruah.