In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Monday, April 9, 2018

13230 - How shoddy execution of SC's ruling on Aadhar has turned life into a living nightmare for the elderly - India Today

  • Adila Matra
  • New Delhi
  • April 8, 2018


  • HIGHLIGHTS
  • People are being harassed by state/centre agencies in the name of Aadhaar.
  • SC extended the deadline to link Aadhaar indefinitely.
  • Telecom providers Airtel and Vodafone are refusing to issue new SIMs to people without an Aadhaar card.

Senior citizens are being harassed by various service providers in the name of Aadhaar, even when the Supreme Court has said that no agency could insist the citizens on producing Aadhaar.

Last month, when the Supreme Court extended the deadline for Aadhaar indefinitely, many, who were dithering over their decision to link/get the document, heaved a collective sigh of relief. Yet, nearly a month later, the relief has turned into a nightmare for many as Aadhaar continues to dictate their existence, making lives miserable.

A week-long investigation by Mail Today across Delhi-NCR has found that citizens, including seniors, are being harassed by various service providers, both private and public, in the name of Aadhaar, even when the Supreme Court had clearly stated in its March ruling that except for subsidies, no agency, either Centre or State, could insist the citizens on producing Aadhaar.

For instance, do you need Aadhaar to get a new/duplicate SIM card? Do senior citizens need to link their pension accounts to Aadhaar to withdraw money? The answer is no.

But the ground reality is one of confusion and ambiguity.
Seventy-three-year-old CPN Thakur, a retired doctor, from Muzaffarpur, Bihar, had to get a new SIM card for his wife's phone in the name of his neighbour as his wife's Aadhaar fingerprints could not be read by the machines, a problem which Thakur too experienced while trying to link his phone numbers to Aadhaar.

Neither was he aware that getting a new SIM card does not necessarily require Aadhaar. Thakur has now moved the Supreme Court saying that the machines are not able to read his Aadhaar fingerprints anymore.

"After I filed the petition, a few officials came from Patna to update my biometric information on Aadhaar. After five visits and two fingerprint machines, they were able to get one match," said Dr Thakur.

CL Roy, 70, a retired scientist from Indian Space Research Organisation, recuperating after a knee surgery in Ahmedabad was told by a mobile service provider to "take new connections on someone else's Aadhaar."

However, after a lot of requests, executives from the service provider visited his house and linked both his and his wife's number to Aadhaar.

"This is such a hassle. I don't understand why they did not think of these things before," said Roy.

Again, like Thakur, Roy wasn't informed that a new connection did not require an Aadhaar. He narrated the experience of a bedridden fellow scientist at the hands of a leading public sector bank.

"The bank officials warned that his pension might stop if didn't link his pension account to Aadhaar. How is a bedridden man supposed to do this?" asked Roy.

"Finally, the bank manager went to his house. It was a pain to see them trying to get his fingerprints and after several attempts, they managed to get it," recalled Roy. "It is scary."
According to a new study, our fingerprints do slightly change as time progresses. So how do you open an account in a bank which relies on biometrics when your fingerprints don't match?
Here is what the spokesperson of State Bank of India has to say, "You can open a basic account via an app called YONO with the Aadhaar number. Only those who visit a branch for additional benefits need to provide biometric data. True, not everyone is able to access an app. We are looking into the matter."

Sixty-six-year-old Ratna Mitra never thought she would ever feel so insecure financially after her husband died a few years ago. Her husband had invested wisely in shares and elsewhere. Everything was going well until February this year when she didn't receive her monthly dividends from the shares her husband had bought.

"I was in for a rude shock when I called up the bank. I was told that the bank refused to accept the dividends and they were sent back to the share companies, from where they had come," said Mitra.

The bank officials told her that she had not yet submitted her Aadhaar number, and without that, the banks would not accept any dividends from the companies.

Later, as she tried to sync her bank accounts with Aadhaar, she was told that her phone number wasn't linked with Aadhaar and that she would need to do that first.

"It was a nightmarish experience for a senior citizen like me," said Mitra.

I haven't received my ration for a few months
Sixty-eight-year-old Samiuddin sits in his modest house in Badarpur, helpless. Both his ration and pension are on hold, the reason being that his fingerprints and iris scan do not match the one on his Aadhaar card procured four years ago.
"It has been seven months since I got my pension," Samiuddin narrates the tale of horror.


Samiuddin claims that his pension is on hold as his fingerprints dont match.

"I go to the bank every day and they ask me to come back after one month. Sometimes they say there is something wrong with the phone number on my Aadhaar and sometimes they say it is the fingerprint that is causing the issue. I don't know what or who to believe," he says.

Samiuddin has visited both the pension office and his bank, but there has been no respite. To top it, he alleges that he is being denied ration as his fingerprints don't match.

"It has been a few months since I am able to get ration in my name. We survive because my wife also has a ration card. So do my kids. They keep telling me to update my biometrics," he says.

"I have gone to different Aadhaar centers multiple times. They just keep directing me to other offices," Samiuddin was at the UIDAI office of Pragati Maidan, trying his luck when we met him. The officers at the UIDAI headquarters had asked him to go to the Nehru Place center tomorrow.
"I don't think that will be of any use, he says. But do I have a choice?" he signs off.

From taunts to advice, be ready for all
If you think Aadhaar is a headache only for senior citizens, prepare to stand corrected. Samuel George, a 30-year-old resident of Kaushambi was denied a duplicate SIM by his neighbouring Vodafone mini store on grounds that he did not have an Aadhaar.

Though he had all other documents including voter ID, driving license and even his passport, the customer care executive at the store refused to budge.

"I was told that the store could not issue duplicate SIM without Aadhar and was told to go to the main store at Nirman Vihar," said George.

"The entire population of East-Delhi was there. The customer care executive sniggered at me when I told him I don't have an Aadhaar. I finally got my SIM after waiting in queue for nearly two hours and getting an unsolicited lecture from a Vodafone executive on the importance of Aadhaar and how it can make my life easy," said George.

"The message seems to be, get Aadhaar or be ready for harassment."

Public waiting in queue for Aadhaar registration at one of the enrolment centres in the Capital. There are over 25,000 centres across the country. (Photo: Qamar Sibtain)

A Vodafone spokesperson who did not want to be identified, issued an e-mail statement saying "Other forms of KYC (know your customer) documents to establish proof of identity and proof of residence can also be used to secure a new connection but the customer will/may need to re-verify it in future using ADHAAR in line with applicable laws and guidelines."
Many other service providers, too, are insisting on the primacy of Aadhaar.

Meenakshi Patel, an Airtel user too was hassled for not having an Aadhar when she visited one of its stores for a new SIM in Pandav Nagar.

"I needed a nano SIM. The customer care executive asked me to give my thumb impression thinking that I have Aadhar. When I told him I do not have one, his immediate question was, are you even an Indian if you do not have Aadhaar? I was shocked," recalled Patel.

"It was the most humiliating experience in my life. I had all other identity documents with me. Yet they chose to ignore it. It is unacceptable that my identity as an Indian hinge on just one document," she said.


Apologising for the behaviour of the customer care executive, an Airtel spokesperson who chose to be anonymous told Mail Today that as far as the company is concerned, we have made it clear that all the options are accepted. New/duplicate SIM cards can be taken through paper-based verification. The retailers should clarify that. All options are available to customers. Its just that Aadhar makes the process faster, the spokesperson said.