In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, April 9, 2020

14440 - SECRET HISTORY OF AADHAAR (2018)


JANUARY 27, 2018 / 

JAIRUS BANAJI

SECRET HISTORY OF AADHAAR

In 1922 IBM acquired a German punch card company called Dehomag which was given the license to use the parent’s proprietary card sorting and tabulating technology in Germany.

When the Nazis took over, IBM didn’t pull out of Germany. In 1933, Dehomag’s largest contract was for leasing machinery to tabulate the German census. Dehomag’s punch card machines were also used to compile ‘‘nearly all the medical, health and welfare statistics in Germany’’.

When Dehomag opened a new plant in January 1934, the company’s general manager said in his inaugural speech, “We [Dehomag] are very much like the physician, in that we dissect, cell by cell, the German cultural body. We report every individual characteristic on a little card… We are proud that we may assist in such a task, a task that provides our nation’s Physician [Adolf Hitler] with the material he needs for his examinations. Our Physician can then determine whether the calculated values are in harmony with the health of our people. It also means that if such is not the case, our Physician can take corrective procedures to correct the sick circumstances”.

Punched card machines. D11 tabulating machine by Deutsche Hollerith-Maschinen-Gesellschaft (DEHOMAG), Berlin,


On reading the translation of this speech, US-based IBM President Thomas Watson congratulated the manager. Germany was IBM’s second largest market and Watson’s chief concern was to maintain IBM’s dominant position in the German market, even one ruled by the Nazis.

In 1939, Dehomag again received the contract for the German census. According to the New York Times (17 May 1939), “It will provide detailed information on the ancestry, religious faith and material possessions of all residents. Special blanks will be provided on which each person must state whether he is of pure ‘‘Aryan’’ blood. The status of each of his grandparents must be given and substantiated by evidence in case of inquiry.”

In fact, by 1939, Dehomag designed custom programmes so that its machines could be leased to concentration camps. Punch card data helped camp administrators track the amount of food needed to keep prisoners alive for a minimum amount of time; to identify prisoners; to keep track of prisoners’ ethnicity (including the degree of Jewish and Aryan background) and religion; to determine work assignments; to keep track of punishments administered to each prisoner; to record whether a prisoner was able to work; and to maintain death statistics. To simplify data analysis, prisoners were tattooed with a five-digit code that corresponded to the punch card containing their demographic data. When a German factory needed prison laborers with particular skills, Dehomag’s punch cards were used to identify such prisoners and move them to where they were needed.

By 1940 IBM machines kept track of German munitions, spare parts for the German fighter planes and bombers, combat orders, and troop movements. IBM’s activities were legal, and royalty payments to IBM continued to flow to the US through its Swiss bank account.

Godard’s brilliant 1965 film Alphaville is about an Orwellian, technocratic dystopia in a distant corner of the galaxy, a city controlled by a sentient computer called Alpha 60 that has banned love and self-expression and exerts unrelenting electronic tyranny over the brainwashed humans living there. FBI agent Lemmy Caution (Eddie Constantine) arrives there on a mission to destroy this computer and kill the mastermind who invented it. He falls in love with the evil scientist’s daughter (Anna Karina) but has to teach her the meaning of the word “love”, since human emotions have been expunged from Alphaville’s allowable vocabulary and any expression of them warrants executions. Despite the overt sci-fi mould of the film, it is frighteningly accurate in its depiction of the world that has largely come to pass, one dominated by the fusion of technology with the authoritarianism of the modern state, a nexus that Marcuse denounced in ‘One-Dimensional Man’ back in 1964. ‘We are already living in the future’, Godard is supposed to have said at the time, and, as one critic points out, the world today is ‘very much closer to the director’s creation than it was in 1965’.

Even if you’ve signed up for Aadhaar, have no illusions about where the antecedents of this totalitarian scheme lie.