AADHAAR RELATED ARTICLES: 13887 - Congress red flags DNA bill, demands withdrawal

In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.

On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.

In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.

In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.

In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.

"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi

Ram Krishnaswamy

Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, September 15, 2018

13887 - Congress red flags DNA bill, demands withdrawal - Indian Express

Congress red flags DNA bill, demands withdrawal

Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out how the government first listed the DNA Technology Regulation Bill, 2018 in the Rajya Sabha during the monsoon session but quickly withdrew it.

Published: 27th August 2018 12:47 AM |

Abhishek Manu Singhvi. (File Photo| PTI)

By Amit Agnihotri

Express News Service

NEW DELHI: Citing leakages of Aadhaar data, the Congress has red-flagged the DNA bill saying not only did such profiling of citizens violated their right to privacy, the legislation was introduced in parliament in a hush-hush manner.

Congress leader Abhishek Manu Singhvi pointed out how the government first listed the DNA Technology (Use and Application) Regulation Bill, 2018 in the Rajya Sabha during the monsoon session but quickly withdrew it fearing an Opposition backlash only to notify it in the Lok Sabha’s list of business late on August 8 night and introduce it the next day.

“The idea was to resist the opposition to introduction of the bill. The magnitude of desperation of the Modi government is so huge, that they did not even wait for the Ministry of Electronics and IT to present its Data Protection Bill, as the DNA Bill violates the principles of the Srikrishna Committee Report on data protection in India and the Personal Data Protection Bill submitted by the committee,” said Singhvi.

“We demand the DNA bill be withdrawn,” he said.

He alleged the recent government flip-flops over Aadhaar data, Supreme Court recognising right to privacy as fundamental, date collection through tainted global firms and absence of a data protection law were centre’s attempts at snooping into the lives of common people.

Getting into the specifics, the Congress leader said among the major loopholes in the DNA bill were related to selection of members of the DNA Regulatory Board, Data Processors and Data Collectors do not have compliance to ensure data protection, Entitlement of powers to DNA Regulatory Board overpowering judiciary, no information to Data Subjects about data sharing with third parties and no clarity on deletion of data.

Noting the DNA database could lead to be another Aadhaar like data leaks, without adequate protection and safeguards, the Congress leader said there was greater risk of information from DNA profiling getting misused to create a profile of an individual and use it for surveillance as well as for making profits.

“DNA samples can reveal not just how a person looks, or what their eye colour or skin colour is, but also more intrusive information like their allergies, or susceptibility to diseases,” he said.

Talking about further shortcomings in the DNA bill, Singhvi said that while there was no guarantee of data security, the legislation was not in line with the International Convention for the Protection of all Persons from Enforced Disappearance.

Also, the Bill will not only give intrusive details like DNA data, but also gender and caste which are sensitive from a sociological aspect.

Finally, the Modi government did not hold a single consultation with stakeholders and civil society on such a sensitive Bill which reeks of mal intent, Singhvi added.