In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Saturday, September 15, 2018

13891 - DNA database not a threat to privacy - Down to Earth


Forensic DNA profiling is by far the most scientific crime-fighting tool

Last Updated: Tuesday 28 August 2018

The Human DNA Profiling Bill has been in the making for over a decade now. Originally proposed in 2007, the Bill intends to create a National DNA Data Bank and establishes regulations on the use of DNA profiles. Initially, the Bill was presented to the Union Cabinet in 2015 but was deferred after concerns were raised over privacy and data security. An expert committee was set up by the Department of Biotechnology to address these issues. Several deliberations and multiple iterations later, a revised Bill to regulate and standardise DNA testing was introduced by the government in the Parliament this monsoon session.

Privacy issues raised
Once again, concerns are being raised about violation of right to privacy and data security in implementing DNA profiling infrastructure and parallels are being drawn with issues linked to Aadhaar. Questions have been raised on how the government should control the use of the information in the database and how they can ensure that a person with access to this information does not misuse the same?

To allay the concerns, it is pertinent to emphasise that the DNA Bill has clearly defined that DNA profiles, samples and records will be made available only to the law enforcement and criminal justice system for conviction, exoneration and to link unidentified bodies and missing persons.

Also, the Bill clearly states that DNA samples will be collected from a person (except any offence punishable with death or imprisonment terms exceeding 7 years) only with consent. If the person refuses, then the investigating officer has to request the magistrate to grant permission to take the DNA sample. This approval is given only if the magistrate is convinced it will prove or disprove the guilt of the arrested person. Additionally, if the trial court is satisfied with the accused person’s plea that DNA sample taken from the accused or the crime scene is contaminated, the court may direct the case for re-examination.

Unlike Aadhaar, DNA Database is not for every resident of India
One has to draw a clear line between the Aadhaar system and DNA database. While, the Aadhaar is meant for each and every person residing in the country, the DNA database is only for the convicted offenders and criminal elements involved in heinous crimes. One can draw an analogy with the fingerprint records of criminals maintained by Finger Print Bureaus at the National and State level. Hence, the fear in the mind of a common man that he or she will have to provide sample for DNA database is baseless and needs to be dispelled.

Global acceptance of DNA technology in forensic
Related Stories
The DNA technology in forensic is highly accurate and globally accepted as a gold standard for human identification from biological evidence. The chances of error are minimal as compared to other techniques. However, the success of this system depends on proper collection, preservation and analysis of evidence material. When done correctly by following the stringent norms, forensic DNA profiling is by far the most scientific crime-fighting tool. However, all DNA labs must be accredited as per the international standards and there must be a mechanism in place to ensure quality. The Bill addresses these concerns and has advocated mandatory accreditation of all labs.

Science behind DNA Profiling
The samples collected from an individual can be analysed to produce a DNA ‘profile’ that is created using data from just 20 locations out of over 3 billion base pairs in the DNA strand. This profile is unique to each individual and resides on portions of the human genome that does not contain any predictive information on genetic health or other phenotypic characteristics such as hair, colour, age, built, height, intelligence, except the gender. 

Once DNA Profile is created with samples collected at the crime scene, it is searched against DNA database of criminals. If a hit (match) is made, then a crime lab is notified and information is released to the investigators. These profiles are inaccessible by third parties and access to the database is highly secured, with very few, well-qualified and trained individuals authorised to access the database only for the purpose of crime investigation. It is important to note that this whole procedure has been designed to protect individual privacy. For instance, each profile is stripped of any individual’s name and given a specimen ID number when digitised. Hence, it remains completely anonymous.

Why DNA Database is important
A DNA database makes it easier for investigators to identify and arrest offenders in most unsolved cases, especially sexual assault. A repository containing DNA profiles of criminals increases the chances of repeat offenders being caught and prevents individuals, whose profiles are stored in the database, from committing offence again. Many offenders often change location or bide their time after each crime to strike again. These repeat offenders can be easily tracked if we have a DNA database in place.

It is true that India is not doing enough to ‘collect’, test’ and ‘compare’ DNA from crime scenes, which amounts to poor conviction and very high pendency rate. This is owing to several challenges such as lack of awareness and clarity about the use of DNA forensics, shoddy crime scene management, inadequate forensics infrastructure, and an over-reliance on conventional evidence.

However, the Indian legal system and investigative agencies are not completely alien to DNA casework. We have several examples such as the Nirbhaya gangrape case, Gudiya rape and murder case, and Venkatesh exoneration case that indicate effective use of DNA casework (collect, test and compare) in enabling rightful conviction and exoneration. Considering the rise in sexual assualt cases against women in India, DNA database is the need of the hour.


Though a lot needs to be done to improve adoption of DNA casework in the country, there is sufficient proof to show that law enforcement and investigative agencies can solve complex crime and help deliver swift justice if provided with the right policy and infrastructure support.