In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Showing posts with label Mohandas Pai. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Mohandas Pai. Show all posts

Thursday, February 15, 2018

12793 - Aadhaar Is a Vital Tool in Achieving Economic Equality for Women - News Deeply


By giving everyone in the country an official ID number, many for the first time, the Aadhaar program is one of India’s most effective tools to increase economic participation, especially for women, says tech investor Mohandas Pai.

WRITTEN BY
PUBLISHED ON
 Feb. 13, 2018
READ TIME
Approx. 5 minutes

A girl gets her fingerprint scanned as she registers for an Aadhaar card. So far, more than 1.19 billion Indians have been given a unique identity number through the digital, biometric program.Ramesh Pathania/Mint via Getty Images

ONE OF THE major challenges India faced 10 years ago was that more than half of the population didn’t have any personal identification. They didn’t have anything to prove their address or their date of birth. Most people couldn’t open a bank account because they simply didn’t have any documents.

The UPA Government launched the Aadhaar project in 2010. It entailed giving every Indian a unique number that could be authenticated electronically. Over the last 7 years, about 1.19 billion Indians have got the unique identity number through a biometric process that takes fingerprints and iris scans. Everyone with an Aadhaar card now has an identity number. This has had remarkable benefits for the poorest of the poor and it has empowered women most of all.

In the last three years, more than 300 million Indians have opened bank accounts using their Aadhaar cards, most of them initially with zero balances through the Prime Minister’s Public Wealth Scheme (PMJDY). The rate of financial inclusion for Indian women increased by 24 percent between 2014 and 2015, compared with an increase of 14 percent among men. During that time, the government also launched a scheme to reduce dependence on kerosene and biomass used for cooking, which created smoke and health hazards, and began giving out free stoves that run on liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) along with a monthly subsidy to cover the cost of the gas.

By paying that subsidy into beneficiaries’ bank accounts via the Aadhaar system, this has encouraged more women to not only open but also operate their bank accounts. Over 35 million poor women have benefited so far and the program aims to reach 80 million.

Today, opening a bank account takes four hours or so as opposed to six days in the past; opening a mutual fund account takes four minutes as opposed to four days; and getting a SIM card takes two minutes as opposed to a day. That convenience makes it easier than ever for women to participate in the formal economy.

Also during the last three years, 65 percent of poor Indians have had their ration cards linked to their Aadhaar numbers. This enables women in particular to get rations at a very subsidized rate. Due to the Aadhaar card, elderly women in India now get their pensions digitally credited to their accounts, instead of in cash. Girls get their scholarships paid into their accounts. And all federal government benefits go to account holders directly.

These automatic payments reduce the need for women and girls to travel to collect their money, which can be expensive and inconvenient, and cuts out the need for intermediaries, a process which is vulnerable to corruption. The move to direct account payments also eliminates millions of fake claims and decreases the diversion of funds, saving more than $10 billion of public funds so far and ensuring that more genuine claimants get their benefits.

Now, if someone requests proof of your identity, say to open a bank account, all you need to do is press your thumb onto a machine which authenticates your print and confirms your identity. Today, opening a bank account takes four hours or so as opposed to six days in the past; opening a mutual fund account takes four minutes as opposed to four days; and getting a SIM card takes two minutes as opposed to a day. That convenience makes it easier than ever for women to participate in the formal economy.

There is criticism that Aadhaar is turning India into a surveillance state, that the state is violating privacy by storing the data. This is wrong. There is no single national database of all transactions done by an individual who has an Aadhaar card as Aadhaar is not a database of transactions. The transactions are in different databases and protected by different laws. For example, banking transactions are protected by one law, and ration card details are in a database protected by another law. Google and Facebook have more sensitive data on their users than the Aadhaar system has on registered individuals.

The Supreme Court of India in a recent judgment also said that all Indians have a fundamental right to privacy and an individual has ownership of his or her personal data and that cannot be misused. In the wake of that ruling, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), which runs the Aadhaar program, has launched tighter security features to protect the system against data breaches.

Many also say that Aadhaar technology is difficult to operate and keeps people out of the system. For example, they say a poor woman in a remote area cannot get her ration if the machine is not able to authenticate her data for some reason. But Aadhaar law says in the event that authentication fails for whatever reason, like lack of electricity, then the cardholder should be asked to produce another form of identity, a ration card, or a copy of their Aadhaar registration form, and cannot be denied their entitlements. Yes, some officials deprive people of their benefits, but that is a dereliction of duty by the official.

With Aadhaar, India is telling the world that it is possible to create an inclusive digital society where the poorest of the poor are not left behind.

I believe that Aadhaar is a great tool of empowerment, especially for women who earlier lacked identity, who could not open or operate bank accounts, and who could not get government benefits. Aadhaar enables women living in villages to receive money via their mobile phones from their sons, daughters and husbands living in cities. It allows women to transfer money with almost no cost.

Many women now have mobile phones and my dream is that in the next few years, every woman in this country will own a smartphone. The government should come up with a scheme to distribute smartphones to every poor woman in the country as done for LPG. This would enable women to access their rights more seamlessly, they can do so many things like operating their bank accounts and using other services from their phones.
Of course, one ID card can’t provide all of the solutions to women’s financial inclusion in India. We also have to look at sources of employment for women.

One is formal employment, which means women have to get an education. We have about 35 million young people attending colleges, of which over 16 million are girls.

There is also a large number of women who do not get a good education. They must be given the skills and tools they need to participate in the workforce. That means removing any possible discrimination, which could include the motherhood penalty. The government has said that maternity leave can be up to six months, but more maternity benefits like creches have to come.
There are many changes we need to make to ensure women in India gain equal economic participation to men. With Aadhaar, India is telling the world that it is possible to create an inclusive digital society where the poorest of the poor are not left behind.


The views expressed in this article belong to its author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Women’s Advancement Deeply. 

Tuesday, January 23, 2018

12760 - Aadhaar biggest tool for empowering poor, says Pai - Outlook India

22 JANUARY 2018  Last Updated at 4:38 PM

    
Bengaluru, Jan 22 As the controversy over Aadhaar rages on, noted IT veteran and tech investor Mohandas Pai said today that the biometric ID is the biggest tool for empowering the poor.
He also pitched for privacy laws to prevent the misuse of Aadhaar. 

"One must understand, Aadhaar is the biggest tool of empowerment for poor and others," Pai told PTI in an email interview here.

There is no evidence of any breach of iris or fingerprint data which is encrypted in Aadhaar, he said on the Tribune controversy about misuse of access by certain vendors.

On the issue of flouting of privacy by some states and private entities, he said: "This has nothing to do with UIDAI, but the misuse of Aadhaar data." The Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) issues Aadhaar.

On January 5, the Delhi Police had registered an FIR based on a complaint by UIDAI over reporting of alleged Aadhaar data breach. It was registered against the "unknown" accused.
Biocon Managing Director Kiran Mazumdar Shaw said one should not confuse reports which suggest data breach with the critical importance of Aadhaar in India.


"If FIR had not been filed we could have had a sensible discussion on the need to improve secure access. Aadhaar cannot and must not be sacrificed because of recent events," she said.

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

5482 - In Bangalore South, will Aadhaar help or hinder Nilekani? - First Post




by A Ram Babu Bangalore: Until a few years ago voters even in urban constituencies by and large preferred known devils to unknown angels. They were unwilling to take chances and opt for new faces. But things have changed. As far as Bangalore is concerned, the General Elections 2014 are unusual in many aspects. People in the city, particularly the professional class, are determined to fight bad governance and corruption.

Citizen's groups have sprung up in the last couple of years propagating change for the better through technology and fair administration. For instance, the Bangalore Political Action Committee (B.PAC) has been doing its bit to usher in good governance and improve living conditions in the city. Despite public resentment in the last several years against unresolved civic issues like woefully inadequate infrastructure and drinking water scarcity, the citizens of Bangalore South, mostly consisting of the middle class, have remained apathetic and showed little enthusiasm during elections. Since 1996 the Bangalore South constituency has been represented by BJP leader HN Ananth Kumar. Lately however, the people in this constituency seemed to have woken up to their rights as citizens. The constituency has a good mix of people from different linguistic groups with a cosmopolitan outlook. The progressive youth including forward-looking techies working in the IT/BT companies as well as the underprivileged are taking active interest in public welfare. In this emerging era of changed electoral dynamics, especially with political activism growing among professionals (more prominently IT professionals) it is difficult to presume that seasoned politicians with advantages like money power and grassroots organizational strength will win elections hands down. 
If Ananth Kumar, the five-time Member of Parliament and BJP national secretary, finds the going tough it is because of the heightened political awareness among the general public. Among the 22 other candidates in the fray, his most formidable opponent is Nandan Nilekani, former Infosys CEO and Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India, who is representing the Congress Party. But Ananth Kumar is banking heavily on the prevailing pro-BJP public mood. His election promises for Bangalore include: a dedicated electricity generating facility for the city, Rs.10,000-crore special package for city infrastructure development and improved suburban railway facilities. The candidates who may not pose any threat to both the BJP and the Congress candidates but may spring surprises by substantially cutting into vote-shares of the mainline national parties are: Nina P Nayak of the Aam Aadmi Party and Ruth Manorama of the Janata Dal (Secular). In terms of political experience all the three candidates (of the Congress, the AAP and the JD-S) can be termed greenhorns. 

Among the eight Assembly segments, the BJP and the Congress have equal share of four MLAs each. Both the BJP and the Congress candidates are Brahmins and the dominant caste groups in the constituency are Brahmins and Vokkaligas. But the caste factor is not particularly seen as a major determinant in voting. 

Among the three new entrants in politics Nandan Nilekan is obviously the most popular. He is confident of impressing voters with his clean record as a public personality and his reputation as the head of the Unique Identification Authority of India. Many voters in the constituency look up to him as a global technocrat with a vision to promote inclusive growth in society and consider him a worthy candidate who can be trusted for delivering the goods, but he faces a tricky problem: he is saddled with a great disadvantage of being a representative of a party which has gained notoriety for corruption and scams. Some observers say if the crisis in the Congress Party and its bleak electoral prospects is seriously undermining what could have been Nilekani’ s unrivalled position in the contest, the Modi wave is greatly helping Ananth Kumar to overcome the anti-incumbency factor he is facing. 

The Congress Party’s strong negative baggage is likely to haunt Nilekani and it may ultimately be his undoing. It did not come as a surprise when writers UR Ananthamurthy and Girish Karnad (both Jnanapeeth award winners) declared their support for Nilekani since they have always voiced their opposition towards the BJP and the RSS. Their open participation in partisan politics during elections has created ripples of protest in KArnataka's literary circles. What came as a major embarrassment to Nilekani was adverse remark made against him by his former colleague in Infosys and B.PAC activist TV Mohandas Pai. He has expressed his serious reservations about Nilekani’s suitability and ability to function as an efficient elected representative in the constituency. 

According to analysts, the differing views of the public in the wake of the Supreme Court’s strictures against the Aadhaar scheme implemented by Nilekani are also likely to impact voters decisions. While Nilekani’s admirers talk of his creditable performance in implementing the nationwide Aadhaar scheme there are skeptics who dismiss the project as an ineffectual venture without a vision. 

But many common people view the scheme as beneficial and they are not really concerned about pitfalls like lack of data security and privacy of confidential personal information. Among the priorities Nelekani has listed to promote Bangalore as a world-class city are: adequate supply of drinking water, cleanliness without garbage, access to quality education and employment opportunities and transparency in governance.

Monday, January 20, 2014

5051 - Ex-Infosys board member Mohandas Pai questions Nandan Nilekani's contribution to Bangalore city - Economic Times

POLITICS AND NATION

2 Jan, 2014, 0852 hrs IST, Chandra R Srikanth, ET Now

Nandan Nilekani has come under friendly fire in his hometown Bangalore, where he is widely expected to contest the Lok Sabha election this year on a Congress ticket. Training his guns on the Infosys cofounder is former colleague Mohandas Pai, who questioned his ex-boss' suitability to represent Bangalore, causing at the very least a public relations embarrassment to Nilekani ahead of his imminent entry into the electoral arena.

"Many people I spoke to have asked me what Nandan has done for Bangalore. While Nandan has done (unique identity number) Aadhaar, I don't know what he has done for Bangalore," Pai told ET NOW in response to a question on whether he will campaign for Nilekani in the 2014 polls.

"There is deep concern among citizens that we are getting a person imposed from above to be an MP, who has not done grassroots work, not been around, who a particular party is trying to parachute here to be anominee and fight," said Pai.

Pai is currently a part of the Manipal Group and heads its global education arm. He is also the vice-president of Bangalore Political Action Committee, a lobby group founded by professionals and business executives with the aim of nudging politics in the direction of good governance. When contacted, Nilekani declined to comment.

In recent days, Nilekani, the chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India, has met Karnataka Chief Minister K Siddaramaiah and Congress' state unit head G Parameshwara. The open secret in political circles is that the 58-year-old Infosys cofounder has expressed to them his interest in contesting from the prestigious Bangalore South constituency that is now represented by Ananth Kumar of Bharatiya Janata Party.

Although there may be murmurs of dissent within Congress about Nilekani's candidature — the most common complaint is that he is not even a member of the party — no Congressman has questioned his suitability to represent Bangalore in the Lok Sabha. Bolstering Nilekani, on the other hand, was Krishna Byre Gowda, the state's agriculture minister who was the Congress candidate against Ananth Kumar from the same constituency.

Nilekani has proven himself in creating and running a large organisation that is the "pride of Bangalore", Gowda said. He has also taken his expertise to the public domain by establishing an institution whose effects will be far-reaching and long-lasting, he said. Moreover, Gowda said that since the aim of Pai's BPAC lobby group is to encourage honest professionals looking to serve in politics, he was mystified by the former Infosys CFO's comment. "I don't know if his objection is to such type of people, or particularly to Nandan," remarked Gowda