In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

5482 - In Bangalore South, will Aadhaar help or hinder Nilekani? - First Post




by A Ram Babu Bangalore: Until a few years ago voters even in urban constituencies by and large preferred known devils to unknown angels. They were unwilling to take chances and opt for new faces. But things have changed. As far as Bangalore is concerned, the General Elections 2014 are unusual in many aspects. People in the city, particularly the professional class, are determined to fight bad governance and corruption.

Citizen's groups have sprung up in the last couple of years propagating change for the better through technology and fair administration. For instance, the Bangalore Political Action Committee (B.PAC) has been doing its bit to usher in good governance and improve living conditions in the city. Despite public resentment in the last several years against unresolved civic issues like woefully inadequate infrastructure and drinking water scarcity, the citizens of Bangalore South, mostly consisting of the middle class, have remained apathetic and showed little enthusiasm during elections. Since 1996 the Bangalore South constituency has been represented by BJP leader HN Ananth Kumar. Lately however, the people in this constituency seemed to have woken up to their rights as citizens. The constituency has a good mix of people from different linguistic groups with a cosmopolitan outlook. The progressive youth including forward-looking techies working in the IT/BT companies as well as the underprivileged are taking active interest in public welfare. In this emerging era of changed electoral dynamics, especially with political activism growing among professionals (more prominently IT professionals) it is difficult to presume that seasoned politicians with advantages like money power and grassroots organizational strength will win elections hands down. 
If Ananth Kumar, the five-time Member of Parliament and BJP national secretary, finds the going tough it is because of the heightened political awareness among the general public. Among the 22 other candidates in the fray, his most formidable opponent is Nandan Nilekani, former Infosys CEO and Chairman of the Unique Identification Authority of India, who is representing the Congress Party. But Ananth Kumar is banking heavily on the prevailing pro-BJP public mood. His election promises for Bangalore include: a dedicated electricity generating facility for the city, Rs.10,000-crore special package for city infrastructure development and improved suburban railway facilities. The candidates who may not pose any threat to both the BJP and the Congress candidates but may spring surprises by substantially cutting into vote-shares of the mainline national parties are: Nina P Nayak of the Aam Aadmi Party and Ruth Manorama of the Janata Dal (Secular). In terms of political experience all the three candidates (of the Congress, the AAP and the JD-S) can be termed greenhorns. 

Among the eight Assembly segments, the BJP and the Congress have equal share of four MLAs each. Both the BJP and the Congress candidates are Brahmins and the dominant caste groups in the constituency are Brahmins and Vokkaligas. But the caste factor is not particularly seen as a major determinant in voting. 

Among the three new entrants in politics Nandan Nilekan is obviously the most popular. He is confident of impressing voters with his clean record as a public personality and his reputation as the head of the Unique Identification Authority of India. Many voters in the constituency look up to him as a global technocrat with a vision to promote inclusive growth in society and consider him a worthy candidate who can be trusted for delivering the goods, but he faces a tricky problem: he is saddled with a great disadvantage of being a representative of a party which has gained notoriety for corruption and scams. Some observers say if the crisis in the Congress Party and its bleak electoral prospects is seriously undermining what could have been Nilekani’ s unrivalled position in the contest, the Modi wave is greatly helping Ananth Kumar to overcome the anti-incumbency factor he is facing. 

The Congress Party’s strong negative baggage is likely to haunt Nilekani and it may ultimately be his undoing. It did not come as a surprise when writers UR Ananthamurthy and Girish Karnad (both Jnanapeeth award winners) declared their support for Nilekani since they have always voiced their opposition towards the BJP and the RSS. Their open participation in partisan politics during elections has created ripples of protest in KArnataka's literary circles. What came as a major embarrassment to Nilekani was adverse remark made against him by his former colleague in Infosys and B.PAC activist TV Mohandas Pai. He has expressed his serious reservations about Nilekani’s suitability and ability to function as an efficient elected representative in the constituency. 

According to analysts, the differing views of the public in the wake of the Supreme Court’s strictures against the Aadhaar scheme implemented by Nilekani are also likely to impact voters decisions. While Nilekani’s admirers talk of his creditable performance in implementing the nationwide Aadhaar scheme there are skeptics who dismiss the project as an ineffectual venture without a vision. 

But many common people view the scheme as beneficial and they are not really concerned about pitfalls like lack of data security and privacy of confidential personal information. Among the priorities Nelekani has listed to promote Bangalore as a world-class city are: adequate supply of drinking water, cleanliness without garbage, access to quality education and employment opportunities and transparency in governance.