In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, April 4, 2014

5416 - Experts hail new Privacy Bill more though it favours govt agencies - Business Standard


The 2014 Bill recognizes the Right to Privacy as a part of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and extends to the whole of India

Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  April 1, 2014 Last Updated at 19:12 IST

Read more on:    Surveillance | Interception | Privacy Bill | Niira Radia | Right To Privacy


Fiscal deficit likely to be within 5.1% in FY14: Citi
Inflation-warrior Rajan hits pause button on interest rates

After four to five attempts in the past, the government's latest draft of the Privacy Bill is being called a refined one by experts even though it creates some wide exceptions for law enforcement and intelligence agencies to collect personal information of individuals.

While the first draft of the Bill released in 2011 extended the Right to Privacy to citizens of India, the 2014 version has expanded its ambit to cover all residents of the country. The 2014 Bill also recognizes the Right to Privacy as a part of Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and extends to the whole of India. The 2011 draft Bill did not explicitly recognize the Right to Privacy as being a part of Article 21, and had excluded Jammu & Kashmir from its purview.

ALSO READ: Saving privacy as we knew it

Both the drafts include a list of circumstances under which authorisation for the collection and processing of sensitive personal data is not required. While the list is the broadly the same between the 2011 and 2014 bills, but the latest version exempts insurance company and Government Intelligence agencies which are collecting or processing data "in the interest of the sovereignty, integrity, security or the strategic, scientific or economic interest of India."

A Bangalore based Internet think-tank Centre for Internet and Society said it welcomes many of the changes that are reflected in the Privacy Bill 2014. However, it is cautious about the wide exceptions that have been carved out for law enforcement and intelligence agencies in the Bill.

"The 2014 Bill carves out another exception for Government agencies, allowing disclosure of sensitive personal data without consent to Government agencies mandated under law for the purposes of verification of identity, or for prevention, detection, investigation including cyber incidents, prosecution, and punishment of offences," Centre for Internet and Society said a note analyzing the provisions of the Bill.

The privacy Bill was originally conceptualised to ensure that data collected by the government under various new projects such as Aadhaar or the National Information Grid (NATGRID) is not misused in any way. But following incidents such as the tapping of phone conversations involving lobbyist Niira Radia prompted the government to expand the ambit of the privacy law from just being a data protection law to also cover surveillance and interception.

However, it was unable to reach a consensus due to inter-ministerial conflicts as the law was superseding various provisions under several existing legislations. The government also a committee under retired Delhi High Court Judge Ajit P. Shah in the aegis of the Planning Commission to study international best practices on privacy and surveillance. This committee submitted a report in 2012.

Some noteworthy additions to the new Bill include the term personal identifier which is defined by any unique alphanumeric sequence of members, letters, and symbols that specifically identifies an individual with a database or a data set.

The current Bill has also re-defined, sensitive personal data to denote personal data relating to physical and mental health including medical history, biometric, bodily or genetic information, criminal convictions, password, banking credit and financial data, narco analysis or polygraph test data and sexual orientation.

Once a privacy law comes into being, the government or a private agency will have to adequately inform citizens before collecting data, stating the reasons and only collecting as much information as is necessary for the purpose. It will also have to clearly define the time period for which the data will be stored and the security measures taken to protect the data from misuse. The law also lays down the penalties in case of a breach.

Read more on:    Surveillance | Interception | Privacy Bill | Niira Radia | Right To Privacy