In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, April 6, 2014

5424 - Aadhaar: UPA-II's pet project faces rough weather - Business Standard



Surabhi Agarwal  |  New Delhi  April 4, 2014 Last Updated at 00:09 IST

It was one of the biggest projects undertaken by the United Progressive Alliance government in its second term, but the idea to give a unique identity number to every resident of the country is embroiled in controversy.

The government launched the unique identity, or Aadhaar, project in 2009 and appointed former Infosys chief and co-founder Nandan Nilekani to head it. Under Nilekani, the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) promised to give Aadhaar numbers to 600 million Indians by 2014. And the UIDAI did meet its target one week before Nilekani stepped down as its chief. However, there are many challenges the project faces as it scales up and moves to the next level.

The government launched cash transfers in late 2012 with an eye on the 2014 general elections as the idea of transferring subsidies directly into the Aadhaar-linked bank accounts of beneficiaries seemed promising. However, the government hurried through the scheme, which required a complete re-engineering of welfare delivery, severely challenging its implementation.

The government spends over Rs 3,00,000 crore every year on social welfare and a significant portion of it is diverted. Cash transfers promised to fix the leakages and were turning out to be one of the biggest uses for the Aadhaar number.

However, the government's decision in February to put in abeyance cash transfers for the cooking gas subsidy in the wake of ground-level implementation challenges was a big setback. The cooking gas subsidy was the showpiece of the Aadhaar-based payment system, covering 291 of the 640 districts in India. According to government statistics, 17 million consumers had received Rs 3,000 crore as cash subsidy for cooking gas by the the end of January.

Cash transfers were launched in January last year for 26 government welfare schemes. The cooking gas project was rolled out in June and scaled up gradually. It already constitutes between 80 per cent and 90 per cent of all cash transfers. The scheme is not being pushed by the government after the Supreme Court ruled Aadhaar could not be made mandatory for availing government services.

To be sure, the UIDAI has done remarkably well when it comes to meeting its enrolment target: it has already crossed the 600 million mark - a goal it had set for itself when it first started out. Moreover, the Cabinet has also expanded the mandate of the UIDAI to enroll more than 600 million people. Over 60 million bank accounts have been seeded with Aadhaar already, and over 100 agencies are using it for authentication services. This is expected to rise further.

The Reserve Bank of India has also recently asked banks to put in place the infrastructure required to ensure that Aadhaar-based biometrics can be used for authentication of card transactions. After an initial resistance, banks have largely accepted Aadhaar as proof of identity and address, and some have also begun to launch applications based on its payment gateway and authentication services.

However, one of the biggest roadblocks for Aadhaar is the petition in court questioning the rationale for making it mandatory for government services. This has turned into an argument on the need for a unique identity number, with the very fundamentals of the project being questioned in the Supreme Court. Moreover, the UID Bill, which gives the project statutory backing, is yet to be cleared by Parliament. Another piece of legislation, which is required to douse the privacy concerns pertaining to the project, the Privacy Bill, seems like a distant reality, too. The Bill, which would have addressed issues such as misuse of information collected for the UIDAI by third-party agencies, is pending approval.

And the implications of it are already being felt. In a case of a gang rape in Goa, a court there had asked the UIDAI to share biometric data of residents in the state. The UIDAI moved the Bombay High Court against it, but it did not prevent the sharing of Aadhaar details with the Central Bureau of Investigation.

Finally, on March 24, the Supreme Court directed the Centre not to share Aadhaar details with any agency without the consent of the holder. It also asked the government to immediately withdraw all orders that had made Aadhaar compulsory for registration of marriage or property or availing of the subsidy on cooking gas cylinders or any other service.