In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, March 4, 2018

12923 - The questionable foundation of Aadhaar - Live Mint


Mandatory linking of the public distribution system to Aadhaar has made access to some basic needs, especially ration, even more difficult for some

Last Published: Fri, Mar 02 2018. 01 43 AM IST
Osama Manzar


The fact that the Data Protection Bill is yet to become an Act is proof that there is no sense of urgency among government officials when it comes to keeping the data of citizens safe. Photo: Priyanka Parashar/Mint

When the idea of Aadhaar was being discussed and even when the law was approved by Parliament, Aadhaar was supposed to enable access to government schemes and entitlements for the rural and marginalised populations.

In the last two years we have seen that Aadhaar has only made access to schemes and entitlements more difficult.

In an interview to the Times of India last month, economist and social scientist Reetika Khera said, “I used to say Aadhaar is a remedy in search of a disease. Now, I say that the remedy is worse than the disease.”

I couldn’t agree more.

Our organization, Digital Empowerment Foundation, works at the grassroots level, usually in the poorest of poor districts. We see on a daily basis, how lack of information about government schemes and lack of access to the same is affecting lives. We also see how mandatory linking of the public distribution system to Aadhaar has made access to some basic needs, especially ration, even more difficult for some.

While Aadhaar was “supposed” to be a saviour, for many it has become a foe because the Aadhaar system could not accommodate for rough thumbprints or because the biometric machine could not identify them.

According to reports, by the end of October 2017, more than 500 million subscribers had already linked their phones to Aadhaar. However, if Aadhaar was supposed to facilitate access to government schemes and services, why is the government forcing linking of Aadhaar to private telcos? And who takes responsibility for this data? Are we dependent on the servers of the government or the servers of the telcos? In case of a data breach, will the government be held accountable, or the private service providers?

We must understand that the linking of Aadhaar to various personal details—including mobile number, bank account number and even health insurance—creates a digital profile of a person based on aggregated data, which can easily be misused.
Even though Section 28 of the Aadhaar Act promises to “protect” your data and “ensure confidentiality of identity information and authentication records of individuals”, this data is at great risk, especially in the absence of a proper data protection law.

The fact that the data protection bill is yet to become an Act is proof that there is no sense of urgency among government officials when it comes to keeping the data of citizens safe.

This lack of urgency can further be proved by the provision of the new e-Aadhaar password, which is a combination of the first four letters of a person’s name and his/her year of birth. Both of these are easily known by our friends, families, colleagues, acquaintances and often strangers or security guards who want to confirm our identity before letting us into an office, building, bar, theatre or the airport.

This means, anybody who knows my name and year of birth, can easily access my e-Aadhaar and even potentially misuse it.
With the citizens being forced to link their Aadhaar IDs to more and more public and private services, the government is only putting personal information of the citizens in jeopardy without a proper mechanism for either synchronization of data or protection of this aggregated data.

If Aadhaar is what it claims to be—a means “to provide for good governance, efficient, transparent and targeted delivery of subsidies, benefits and services”, why is the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) making citizens link it to private service providers? How does it help in the targeted delivery of government services and subsidies?

The government must realise that Aadhaar, in its current form—in which citizens are being left with little choice regarding whether or not they want an Aadhaar and whether or not they should link it to various public and private services—in the absence of proper digital infrastructure and security mechanisms, is a model that fails its citizens.


Osama Manzar is founder-director of Digital Empowerment Foundation and chair of Manthan and mBillionth awards. He is member, advisory board, at Alliance for Affordable Internet and has co-authored NetCh@kra–15 Years of Internet in India and Internet Economy of India. He tweets @osamamanzar.