In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, June 6, 2018

13646 - Uidai Beefs Up Data Security, Limits Digital Payment Companies' Access To Aadhaar Data - INC42



The UIDAI Divides Authentication User Agencies Into Two Types — Local AUAs (Banks) And Global AUAs (Payment Companies)

June 4, 2018 5 min read

After mobile wallet transactions fell 13% to 268.79 Mn in March 2018, it looks like wallet companies are ready to record further downfall in the first quarter of 2018, thanks to the UIDAI (Unique Identification Authority of India)’s attempt to ensure data security.

According to an ET report, the UIDAI has imposed restrictions on digital payment companies accessing its database by classifying them as local authentication user agencies and citing concerns over their security systems.

It is to be noted that an authentication user agency (AUA) captures Aadhaar information from a person and submits it to the Central Identities Data Repository for validation.
Now, the UIDAI has segregated this agency into two — local AUAs, which can access limited information, and global AUAs, which can access the complete information in the repository. Global AUAs cover banks while all payment companies and other entities in the authentication business fall under local AUAs.

According to the report, the UIDAI noted that “only global AUAs will be allowed access to full eKYC along with Aadhaar numbers, while local agencies will have restricted access.”
In simple terms, this means that payment companies can only accept virtual Aadhaar numbers from consumers, which are provided by the UIDAI for verification.

It essentially means the woo-woo magic that happened on devices with your Aadhaar number won’t happen anymore; rather you will have to source your virtual ID from the UIDAI website and provide it to the authentication agency. Just another process for KYC-lazy customers, who have stopped using mobile wallets because of these requirements.

The UIDAI also noted that “some entities required to verify clients with Aadhaar number may not have the requisite security systems needed to use or store these numbers and have been precluded from the list of global AUAs.”
The Unending Saga Of E-Kyc, Rbi, Uidai, And Supreme Court

Ever since the RBI issued stricter KYC guidelines for digital payment users last October, the sector has seen some major upheaval. As reported earlier by Inc42, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) had refused to extend the deadline for KYC (Know Your Customer) beyond February 28, 2018, stating that enough time has already been granted to adhere to the prescribed guidelines.

However, adding to the confusion, the country’s Supreme Court, on March 13, 2018, extended the deadline for mandatory linking of Aadhaar card to avail of various government services and welfare schemes. Reports claimed that more than 50% of the PPIs are still not KYC compliant.

Most recently, the RBI asked all payment system operators in the country to store data relating to their customers within India. The move is geared towards ensuring that user details remain secure against privacy breaches. According to the directive, payment companies have been given six months to comply with the newly released norms.

According to industry estimates, the fall, in terms of the number of digital wallet users, has been somewhere around 80% to 90% and is largely the result of most customers shying away from full KYC authentication.

Notably, the completion of the KYC involves linking of Aadhaar card and PAN card to e-wallet mobile applications. The RBI had earlier stated that customers who are not willing to follow the KYC process could close their PPI accounts and get the balance money transferred to their respective bank accounts.

What Is Aadhaar Virtual Id?
Inc42 had earlier reported that the UIDAI has introduced the beta version of the VID (virtual ID) feature. In January, the UIDAI launched a two-layered safety net feature to avoid data breaches. This consists of a 16 digit Virtual ID and limited know-your-customer (KYC) for Aadhaar number holders.


With the virtual ID, there will be no need to share the real Aadhaar number at the time of authentication. Instead, a randomly generated 16-digit code will be shared with the agency every time.

This ID, along with biometrics of the user, like the name, address, and photographs, can provide the necessary details to the concerned agency, without being able to track the actual Aadhaar number of the user.

A user can generate multiple virtual IDs as per the need. The older IDs will get cancelled once a fresh ID is issued to the user. Since the virtual ID gets mapped to the individual’s Aadhaar number, there will be no more need to share the original Aadhar number.

While, the limited KYC feature will provide the agencies with only the essential details, thus avoiding the chance to track and store a user’s Aadhaar number. Agencies can do their own KYC and identify users with ‘tokens’.

Also, as stated by the UIDAI in a media statement, “Agencies that undertake authentication won’t be allowed to generate the virtual ID on behalf of Aadhaar holder.

The UIDAI has been in a full-drawn battle in the Supreme Court to defend the Aadhaar system, claiming that 13ft high and 5ft thick walls protect Aadhaar data, which continues to witness major leaks. The move to limit access of local AUAs ie wallet companies to UIDAI data in order to ensure data security might be counter-productive to the digital push of the government.



Note: We at Inc42 take our ethics very seriously. More information about it can be found here.