In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Sunday, August 1, 2010

363 - State govts responsible for not achieving agriculture growth: Montek Singh

"The smart card can in fact be linked to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) number", Ahluwalia said.


Planning commission deputy chairman Montek Singh Ahluwalia today held state governments responsible for the failure to achieve four per cent agriculture growth in the 11th Plan, which runs till 2012.

"The state governments are not according the priority that they should to agriculture which is the main constraint in achieving the targeted agriculture growth. They have to be much more proactive," Ahluwalia said at an interactive session organised by the Karnataka Planning Board here.

The country's average farm growth in the first three years of the 11th Five-Year Plan (2007-12) is only 2.2%, while the target is 4% for the entire period.

Citing an example, Ahluwalia said in Karnataka, farm growth had remained stagnant at 0.1% in 2009-10 and the contribution of agriculture to state GDP was 17%.

Food security, which was a major problem today because of the rise in global food prices could not be tackled merely by ensuring equitable distribution. Production is an integral part of food security and in fact India's food problem could be solved through "production oriented solutions".

"Agricultural productivity per hectare has to go up."

Not only has the wheat production to go up from the present two per cent but also production of pulses, he said.

"The food inflation is not so much because of cereals as because of pulses. The pulse production in India has remained stagnant in the last ten years as when we were on the growth track people could not afford the pulses and now when we are growing, the demand for pulses is also increasing. We need a revolution here," he said.

Compared to other countries in the world where pulse consumption was almost negligible, in India pulse consumption was the most.

With diversification of food that is consumed, increase in food production needed to be much more broad based. Milk production, a mere 6%, also need to be stepped up.

Bringing in the Food Security Act was one of the initiatives Centre was contemplating to tackle the problem. The government was working on the Act, he said.

On the public distribution system, Ahluwalia said "moving on to a smart card system, a smart card which is usable for any food item, would make the system much more efficient and reduce stealing".

"If there can be a consensus on this (smart card system), it will be a major reform in the PDS," he said.

The smart card can in fact be linked to the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) number, Ahluwalia said.
To remove the "differences of opinion" that may prevail among the state governments as to who are the poor who will be entitled for the smart cards, scientific methods can be devised at the national level to determine the beneficiaries and "states be given the freedom to whom they wish to give it to", he said.

In view of the food inflation, a strong PDS system was necessary to make sure the poor can afford the high prices of food."PDS reform is most important and I think we will be able to persuade the states", Ahluwalia said.