In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, August 27, 2010

460 - SC backs NAC’s food security campaign - Live Mint Article

Apex court accepts govt proposal to extend the food security concept to even those living above the poverty line
Liz Mathew , liz.m@livemint.com

In a fresh validation of the political campaign led by Congress chief Sonia Gandhi, the Supreme Court on Thursday endorsed the concept of food security and accepted the Union government’s proposal to conditionally extend it to even those living above the poverty line (APL).

The apex court, which on 27 June suggested that the APL population should be kept out of the purview of the Public Distribution System (PDS), recommended short-term measures to liquidate surplus foodstock by distributing it to the poor “at a very low cost or no cost”.

It also agreed with the government’s argument that the foodgrains left over after meeting the total allocation of the population in the categories of Antyodaya Anna Yojana and below poverty line (BPL) could be allocated to those in APL category. “That is precisely what the court had in mind when the previous order was passed.” the court said in its Thursday order.

The Supreme Court bench comprising justices Dalveer Bhandari and Deepak Verma, based on the findings of the justice D.P. Wadhwa committee on PDS, asked the government to expedite the “computerization” of the entire PDS, right “from the godowns of the Food Corporation of India (FDI) to the ultimate beneficiary to ensure greater transparency”.

“We request the Union of India to expedite the whole process and submit a comprehensive report to this court as early as possible and any even within six weeks from today. The Union of India may take the help and assistance of any organization or agency which it may deem appropriate,” the court said, adding that there should be a common software for all the states.

The court had earlier suggested that the government could take the help of agencies such as Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI) for computerization. In its affidavit, the Union government has told the court that the department of food and public distribution has taken up several initiatives for computerization of PDS.

Mint on Thursday reported that the government has created a committee to prepare a road map for the computerization of PDS and link it both to the Food Corporation of India (FCI) and UIDAI.

In its affidavit, the government said that the task force set up on 9 August and headed by director general, National Infomatics Centre will have representatives from the department of Information Technology, and UIDAI and department of food and public distribution, FCI and food secretaries of selected states as members for working out the modalities for integration of the existing projects and to “suggest as to how UIDAI will be eventually leveraged.”

The Supreme Court asked the Union government to ensure food security and to take steps to ensure secure storage and preservation of the foodgrains. It said: “Permanent solution lies in constructing adequate storage facilities. The Union of India may consider constructing at least one large Food Corporation of India godown in every state and consider the possibility of construction of one godown in every division if not in every district of the state.”

Urging the government to take short term measures the bench said there should be an increase in the quantum of food supply to the BPL population, keep the fair price shops in the country for all the 30 days in a month and distribute foodgrains to the deserving population at a very low cost or no cost.”

The apex court will hear the matter further on 31 August.

The Hunger Project is a joint effort of Mint and the Hindustan Times to track, investigate and report every aspect of the struggle to rid India of hunger. If you have any suggestions, write to us at thehungerproject@livemint.com