In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Thursday, August 12, 2010

419 - Nandan Nilekani Scripting the Indian Dream by Soumitra Dasgupta

Nandan Nilekani Scripting the Indian Dream by Soumitra Dasgupta
18th Jan 2010




The valedictory address at any major conference is always awaited with bated breath. Usually it is delivered by a speaker of international stature, who draws instant recognition amongst those circles. This year, we have Nandan Nilekani doing us the honour. On this note, I must also add, that this blog is not about introducing the man – he needs no introduction really. Rather, it is about exploring the significance of such an address by one, who is credited to have built a legacy, which most others could not even dream of. In his book “Imagining India,” he talks about ideas: that have arrived, that are in progress, that in battle and finally the ones to anticipate.

Ideas that have arrived:
India’s burgeoning population, once considered to be a major setback to effective distribution of resources, has an upside too. The fact that the country also houses a very large English speaking workforce, has worked to its advantage. The working age population in India, amongst the highest in the world, is now a source of strength and should be leveraged judiciously to bring about the desired results. The demographic dividend is finally paying off as we usher in globalisation and see the entrepreneurial spirit take over, amongst young people.

Ideas in progress:
For any nation to progress, the focus on education is an imperative. The Indian schools face a tough challenge today. Primarily, the infrastructure is appalling, adding to the woe, is an outdated course curriculum that doesn’t help anyone. The government’s immediate challenge is to address this issue and bridge the gap. He also talks about how the infrastructure in cities need to improve, in order to create a conducive environment for investment. The taxation system in India, with a focus on centralized power and control has been instrumental in creating a labyrinth of a tax structure at the state level. The present focus, is on to create a seamless market which allows free flow of goods and services.

Ideas in battle:
The constant shadow boxing between the Left and the Right, each of who comes from a different world view, is causing a gridlock in India’s policy-making . On one hand are those, who hanker for the village republic and on the other, are those preaching globalization. The left also wants a rights-based approach (right to information, right to food, right to work, right to education, etc). While a ‘Rights’ approach can help put the onus on the state, there is more to social change than just passing laws. However there is no fundamental difference on both sides in the desire to eliminate poverty, provide more equity, provide basic public services like health and education, and so on. It is largely a matter of approach. Resolving this gridlock is imperative to making intelligent policy decisions.

Ideas to anticipate:
When a country reaches the cusp of development, it is important to study what happened to other countries when they developed, and what lessons could be learned from them. The future lies in bridging the digital divide by making technology more accessible; providing good quality and affordable healthcare; clear and a sustainable approach to natural resources and explore alternative sources of energy to fuel growth.

Considered amongst the most successful IT entrepreneurs in this country , the man currently responsible for also leading the UIDAI initiative, is really the best suited, to deliver the valedictory at NILF 2010. This blog is just meant to be an arch through which gleams the untraveled world.



About the author:

Soumitra Dasgupta

Soumitra Dasgupta has been with NASSCOM, a little over two years now, and works for the Northern Region Member Engagement Team. He is a Commerce graduate from Bombay University and an MBA from ICFAI Business School.