In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Friday, August 27, 2010

458 - EVM issue raised in parliament TOI

Aadhaar biometric scanners could share the same issues as EVMS in years to come
Ram


Subject: Fw: EVM issue raised in parliament

NEW DELHI: The controversy over Electronic Voting Machines has taken a political turn with TDP chief Chandrabab u Naidu batting for the man who 'proved' that voting machines could be tampered with. The BJP and the Left too join the fray by demanding an all-party meeting to discuss the 'vulnerability' of the EVMs in elections, Times Now reported on Thursday.

According to Times Now, the TDP chief termed as "unfortunate", the arrest of a technocrat Hari Prasad by Maharashtra Police in connection with the theft of an Electronic Voting Machine. He also alleged that Hari Prasad was arrested last Saturday based on a complaint filed by a District Election Officer, which stated that an EVM has been stolen from a government godown.

"The EVMs are tamperable. And, there is no backup. Even experts have raised this issue. Election Commission did not take into consideration all these things, but we don't know why they have arrested the expert. We have raised this issue in Parliament," said Naidu.

"Hari Prasad has only used the machine to prove that it is tamperable. It is not his crime," Naidu said.

Naidu demanded that Prasad be released immediately and all cases against him be withdrawn. He also demanded that the government take steps to ensure that the voting process is made foolproof.

VeTA ( Citizens for Verifiability, Transparency and Accountability in Elections), the NGO for which Prasad was working as technical coordinator, has termed Prasad's arrest a witch-hunt by the EC even as the opposition parties renewed calls for an all-party meet to discuss electronic voting.

The incident has also caught the attention of the world media, with many experts questioning the EC's reaction to criticism.

Producing a letter written by 12 parties, including CPM, RJD, SP and JD(U) to EC in April on the same issue, Naidu had alleged yesterday that EVMs can be tampered with. He said that the doubts about their functioning have "reduced the people's faith in the system". He demanded that the Election Commission convene an all-party meeting to discuss steps required to reform the voting system.

EVM issue raised in Rajya Sabha

Major opposition parties including the BJP and Left yesterday also demanded an all-party meeting to discuss in depth, the "vulnerability" of the Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) in elections.

"We will urge the government to call an all-party meeting," said Leader of Opposition in Rajya Sabha Arun Jaitley in the upper house, adding technical experts should also be called to clear doubts. BJP leader L K Advani has already raised questions about EVMs being tamper-proof. Raising the issue during Zero Hour, M V Mysura Reddy (TDP) said EVMs were vulnerable and did not have backups in case of failure. He alleged that Election Commission was harassing technical experts who had doubts over the functioning of EVMs.

He said cases were slapped against these experts. Reddy was supported by Sitaram Yechury, who said that an all-party meeting should be called to resolve the issue.

V Maitreyan of AIADMK said that EVMs have become the suspects not only for the political class but also for the common man. He said that several European countries have gone back to ballot paper. He also accused the EC of harassing technical experts who questioned the efficacy of the machines.

Chandrababu Naidu demanded that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh should intervene in the matter and convene an all-party meeting to discuss this "important issue."

Naidu said all parties, including BJP, have doubts about the functioning of EVMs and hoped that Congress will also join their campaign. "I spoke to ( senior BJP leader) Arun Jaitely and other leaders. We hope Congress will also support us (on this issue)," he said.

'EVMs not tamperproof'

Hari Prasad was part of a three-member global team that sought to prove that EVMs had their flaws. The team needed an EVM for testing, but the Election Commission did not help efforts by failing to provide machines. The team nevertheless managed to procure one, and that is why he was accused of stealing one from Mumbai.

"From the last conversation I had with him, Hari is staying strong. They are putting pressure on him, but he has not revealed the name of the source who supplied it (the EVM)," said Alex Halderman, assistant professor of computer science at the University of Michigan and one of the world's foremost specialists on voting machine security.

Halderman had teamed up with Prasad and Dutch hacker Robert Valentijn Gonggrijp earlier this year on the invitation of an NRI association called 'Save Indian Democracy' and VeTA to examine the possibility of misusing electronic voting machines (EVM) in India.

Soon after last year's national elections, the Election Commission had publicly challenged anyone to prove that EVMs could be hacked.

To their dismay, the trio found that the Commission was in no mood to give them one of the 1.3 million EVMs for testing, until an anonymous source supplied them with one.

According to the Maharashtra police who are interrogating Hari Prasad, the machine was stolen from the godown at Old Customs House in Mumbai. Hari was arrested on Saturday, soon after he gave a live demonstration of how EVMs could be pre-programmed to favour one candidate or party.

"This is a case where the police action is obviously politically motivated. It is an attempt to intimidate us," Halderman says.

The controversy was further stoked at an industry conference on EVMs in Washington, US, where Alok Shukla, Deputy Election Commissioner at the ECI and Alex Halderman put forth different accounts regarding the case of Hari Prasad.

Halderman, who said that he and his colleagues had worked with Prasad to demonstrate the vulnerability of EVMs to tampering, pleaded with Shukla to call off efforts by the ECI to have the police question Prasad.