In 2009, I became extremely concerned with the concept of Unique Identity for various reasons. Connected with many like minded highly educated people who were all concerned.
On 18th May 2010, I started this Blog to capture anything and everything I came across on the topic. This blog with its million hits is a testament to my concerns about loss of privacy and fear of the ID being misused and possible Criminal activities it could lead to.
In 2017 the Supreme Court of India gave its verdict after one of the longest hearings on any issue. I did my bit and appealed to the Supreme Court Judges too through an On Line Petition.
In 2019 the Aadhaar Legislation has been revised and passed by the two houses of the Parliament of India making it Legal. I am no Legal Eagle so my Opinion carries no weight except with people opposed to the very concept.
In 2019, this Blog now just captures on a Daily Basis list of Articles Published on anything to do with Aadhaar as obtained from Daily Google Searches and nothing more. Cannot burn the midnight candle any longer.
"In Matters of Conscience, the Law of Majority has no place"- Mahatma Gandhi
Ram Krishnaswamy
Sydney, Australia.

Aadhaar

The UIDAI has taken two successive governments in India and the entire world for a ride. It identifies nothing. It is not unique. The entire UID data has never been verified and audited. The UID cannot be used for governance, financial databases or anything. It’s use is the biggest threat to national security since independence. – Anupam Saraph 2018

When I opposed Aadhaar in 2010 , I was called a BJP stooge. In 2016 I am still opposing Aadhaar for the same reasons and I am told I am a Congress die hard. No one wants to see why I oppose Aadhaar as it is too difficult. Plus Aadhaar is FREE so why not get one ? Ram Krishnaswamy

First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.-Mahatma Gandhi

In matters of conscience, the law of the majority has no place.Mahatma Gandhi

“The invasion of privacy is of no consequence because privacy is not a fundamental right and has no meaning under Article 21. The right to privacy is not a guaranteed under the constitution, because privacy is not a fundamental right.” Article 21 of the Indian constitution refers to the right to life and liberty -Attorney General Mukul Rohatgi

“There is merit in the complaints. You are unwittingly allowing snooping, harassment and commercial exploitation. The information about an individual obtained by the UIDAI while issuing an Aadhaar card shall not be used for any other purpose, save as above, except as may be directed by a court for the purpose of criminal investigation.”-A three judge bench headed by Justice J Chelameswar said in an interim order.

Legal scholar Usha Ramanathan describes UID as an inverse of sunshine laws like the Right to Information. While the RTI makes the state transparent to the citizen, the UID does the inverse: it makes the citizen transparent to the state, she says.

Good idea gone bad
I have written earlier that UID/Aadhaar was a poorly designed, unreliable and expensive solution to the really good idea of providing national identification for over a billion Indians. My petition contends that UID in its current form violates the right to privacy of a citizen, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution. This is because sensitive biometric and demographic information of citizens are with enrolment agencies, registrars and sub-registrars who have no legal liability for any misuse of this data. This petition has opened up the larger discussion on privacy rights for Indians. The current Article 21 interpretation by the Supreme Court was done decades ago, before the advent of internet and today’s technology and all the new privacy challenges that have arisen as a consequence.

Rajeev Chandrasekhar, MP Rajya Sabha

“What is Aadhaar? There is enormous confusion. That Aadhaar will identify people who are entitled for subsidy. No. Aadhaar doesn’t determine who is eligible and who isn’t,” Jairam Ramesh

But Aadhaar has been mythologised during the previous government by its creators into some technology super force that will transform governance in a miraculous manner. I even read an article recently that compared Aadhaar to some revolution and quoted a 1930s historian, Will Durant.Rajeev Chandrasekhar, Rajya Sabha MP

“I know you will say that it is not mandatory. But, it is compulsorily mandatorily voluntary,” Jairam Ramesh, Rajya Saba April 2017.

August 24, 2017: The nine-judge Constitution Bench rules that right to privacy is “intrinsic to life and liberty”and is inherently protected under the various fundamental freedoms enshrined under Part III of the Indian Constitution

"Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the World; indeed it's the only thing that ever has"

“Arguing that you don’t care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don’t care about free speech because you have nothing to say.” -Edward Snowden

In the Supreme Court, Meenakshi Arora, one of the senior counsel in the case, compared it to living under a general, perpetual, nation-wide criminal warrant.

Had never thought of it that way, but living in the Aadhaar universe is like living in a prison. All of us are treated like criminals with barely any rights or recourse and gatekeepers have absolute power on you and your life.

Announcing the launch of the # BreakAadhaarChainscampaign, culminating with events in multiple cities on 12th Jan. This is the last opportunity to make your voice heard before the Supreme Court hearings start on 17th Jan 2018. In collaboration with @no2uidand@rozi_roti.

UIDAI's security seems to be founded on four time tested pillars of security idiocy

1) Denial

2) Issue fiats and point finger

3) Shoot messenger

4) Bury head in sand.

God Save India

Wednesday, September 29, 2010

613 - Who’s Who in Nilekani’s UID Dream Team -The Wall Street Journal

AFP/Getty Images
The UID project is considered by many specialists to be the most technologically 
and logistically complex national identification effort ever attempted.

By Amol Sharma

Nandan Nilekani, chairman of India’s Unique Identification Authority, assembled an elite group of software engineers, tech-savvy bureaucrats and biometric experts to build a system that could issue unique 12-digit numbers to all the country’s 1.2 billion people, based on fingerprints and iris scans.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh officially launches that massive identification effort Wednesday.

Most of the tech gurus that designed the unique ID system were of Indian-origin, and volunteered to help the effort without pay. Here’s a look at some of the people on Mr. Nilekani’s Dream Team:

The E-Governor: Srikanth Nadhamuni.

Mr. Nadhamuni was tech employee #1 and became the host in Bangalore for the other engineers who designed the core technology behind the world’s most complex national ID program. After spending 16 years in Silicon Valley as a technologist and entrepreneur at companies including Sun Microsystems, Silicon Graphics and Intel, Mr. Nadhamuni came back to India to work on social-oriented tech projects. He formed the e-Governments Foundation in 2003 with Mr. Nilekani to push for improved municipal government services. Mr. Nadhamuni and the others rented an apartment to use as an office near his home in a gated Bangalore community called Adarsh Palm Retreat. He now heads the unique ID technology team.

The Transactions Expert: Pramod Varma
 Shortly after Mr. Nilekani was tapped to lead the unique ID effort, Mr. Varma called him from the U.S and said he wanted to sign on. He had just been reading Mr. Nilekani’s book, “Imagining India,” a call to action for the country’s government to solve persistent development problems.

Mr. Varma, an Infosys alumnus, had helped start a Boston-area company that specialized in complex inventory management systems for retailers like JC Penney and Target. His firm processes 25 million orders daily for Best Buy alone. “That’s the kind of inventory system we’re looking for at UID,” he says Mr. Nilekani told him. Mr. Varma was one of the first five at the Bangalore apartment.
The Bureaucratic Brains: R.S. Sharma
 
Mr. Nilekani knew the unique ID effort wasn’t all about technology. He would need someone with a deep knowledge of the Indian government to win over skeptics who wanted to protect their bureaucratic fiefdoms. Early on, he brought in Mr. Sharma, a 55-year old bureaucrat from Jharkhand state with background in sanitation and science, to serve as de facto CEO.

Unusually tech-savvy for a government official, Mr. Sharma programmed the first version of the software where unique ID applicants’ demographic information gets entered. He was responsible for hiring and struck deals with various state government agencies and public sector banks to help with sign-up. He brought the post office on board to deliver 1.2 billion unique numbers to Indians via mail. “Technology is a very important part of this, but it’s essentially a governance project,” he says.
The Development Guru: Wyly Wade
  
Mr. Wade, a World Bank consultant who has been coming to India for 14 years and lives in New Delhi now, agreed to advise Mr. Nilekani on the project’s intersections with India’s welfare programs. One major goal of issuing unique identity numbers is to root out corruption in the distribution of benefits ranging from food to health insurance. Falsified and fake identification papers help people siphon away billions of dollars of such aid every year from its intended beneficiaries.

Mr. Wade says the program can give government great insight into how its development schemes are working in practice, but said India needs to be proactive about putting in place robust privacy protections. Though he isn’t a technologist, he worked closely with the team in Bangalore. “It was a Silicon Valley startup inside the Indian government. It might as well have been in someone’s garage,” he says.
The Fingerprints Specialist: Salil Prabhakar

Mr. Prabhakar literally wrote the book on biometrics—or at least a widely used one called the “Handbook of Fingerprint Recognition.” He took periodic leaves from his biometrics company beginning in the fall of 2009 to help the Bangalore team. He also scouted other major national ID and biometrics projects around the world, first at an industry conference in Tampa and then a workshop organized by the World Bank in New Delhi.

He says the tight timeline Mr. Nilekani gave the group— issuing the first unique numbers by March 2010—was a source of anxiety. “We wondered sometimes, can we pull it off? What’s the plan B?” he said. But in the end, what’s being put in place in villages across India now is pretty much what got launched in that Bangalore apartment. “We slept there. We worked there,” he says. “The first designs of the entire system were put together in that room.”